The Progressive Post

Five Scenarios For Europe But No Clear Positioning

03/03/2017

On Wednesday 1st March 2017, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker presented his ‘White Paper’ on the future of Europe to the European Parliament in Brussels. The White Paper presents a range of scenarios for how the European Union could evolve within the next decade(s). ‘What future do we want for ourselves, for our children and for the Union?’ Juncker asks, refraining from presenting any definitive decisions but explicitly opening a democratic debate on how we, as Europeans, would like to shape our own political destiny. Juncker’s idea behind the White Paper is that by the time the European Parliament elections take place in June 2019, European citizens will be able to vote for their preferred version of the union.

The White Paper is also intended to give EU leaders food for thought when they meet in Rome on 25th March to commemorate 60 years of the signing of the Treaty of Rome. The Commission proposes five scenarios for a Europe of the 27 which range from reducing the union to a single market all the way to strengthened integration, because in spite of Brexit ‘we will continue, we have to continue’, as Juncker put it in his speech.

Juncker immediately rejects the ‘nothing but the single market’ scenario, saying the European Union is about more than just markets, products and money. In a second scenario Member States would either ‘carry on’ by strengthening its single market and negotiating trade agreements for its Member States, or only a group of willing Member States continues to more fully integrate their cooperation whereas the rest is free to stay behind. Following the slogan ‘doing more with less’, yet another scenario for the future of Europe would allow for Member States to strengthen their cooperation in policy areas with tangible benefits to its citizens, while doing less in others. Examples include a European Counter-terrorism Agency or a European Agency to combat fraud such as the scandal over emissions cheating. We do not have to read between the lines to understand that this is Juncker’s preferred scenario. In a fifth scenario, a ‘European Union at full speed’, Member States would cooperate more strongly across all policy areas, reinforcing the leadership role of the European Union on climate change, sustainable development, a common foreign and defense policy and a fully integrated single market.

So where does the Commission White Paper leave us on the future of Europe? By presenting reflections and scenarios, the Commission has regrettably not provided a clear political vision for Europe. Far from the ‘political Commission’ Juncker praised when taking office, the Commission is not exactly embracing its right of initiative to propose new laws with this White Paper which does not really qualify as a blueprint for legislative action. Although Juncker references the acceptance speech of Germany’s President Elect Frank-Walter Steinmeier, saying that ‘to encourage others we must be brave ourselves’, the Commission’s strategy to offer various scenarios with no real commitment to a strong European Union is not actually very brave. Juncker’s emotional outpouring at the end of the presentation at the EP clearly shows that he is feeling political pressure to lead in times of crisis. Yet, instead of a clear roadmap for Europe’s recovery and political leadership, the Commission has presented a discussion paper with no real commitment to pave the way forward.

The cautious approach of the European Commission might be an effort to appease rising populism across Europe and beyond. With two major national elections coming up in 2017 in France and Germany, a more optimistic scenario would also be possible. With Germany’s social democratic candidate, and former President of the European Parliament, Martin Schulz overtaking Chancellor Angela Merkel in the polls, France’s centre-right candidate François Fillon under formal investigation (and probably not in the second round) and the center left’s candidate Emmanuel Macron as a possible elected president and an outspoken pro-European, the elections could revive the German-Franco couple as a major engine of a deeper European integration and a more social Europe. Without clear political leadership of the Commission, it will be difficult to keep this engine running.

Ernst Stetter post written in cooperation with Lisa Kastner

Find all related publications
Publications
01/03/2024

The transformation of the mainstream right in Western Europe

Implications for social democracy
01/03/2024

Next Left Vol.15

Progressive Ambition: How to shape Europe in the next decade
27/02/2024

Progressive ideas to make international trade successful for all

19/02/2024

Women CSO leaders for systemic change

How to support feminist leadership in Europe
Find all related news
News
23/02/2024

FEPS mission to Brazil

24/01/2024

Spanish Minister Teresa Ribera awarded FEPS ‘Progressive Person of the Year’

23/01/2024

Call for tender – FFP Research and network coordinator

This call for tender is now closed.
18/01/2024

FEPS President at Euronews talk-show ‘Brussels, my love?’

Find all related in the media
In the media

Teresa Ribera, premiada por su labor en política internacional

by El Plural 26/01/2024
Teresa Ribera has been recognized by FEPS with the 'Progressive Person of the Year' award during the launch of the 'Progressive Yearbook.' Article by El Plural

Teresa Ribera, premio ‘Pregressive person of the year’ por su labor en política internacional

by Europa Press 26/01/2024
Teresa Ribera has been recognized by FEPS with the 'Progressive Person of the Year' award during the launch of the 'Progressive Yearbook.' Article by Europa Press

Teresa Ribera, galardonada como “progresista” del año por la Fundación FEPS

by Agencia EFE 26/01/2024
Article by Spanish news agency Agencia EFE, republished by other media via newswire

»Der er tale om en markant udvikling«: Det vrimler med Wolt-bude

by Politiken 19/01/2024
'"This is a significant development": Wolt workers are everywhere' Politiken's article about the Digital Programme's first policy study: 'Employment terms of platform workers'