The Progressive Post

Gender equality votes in the European Parliament


A narrow left-leaning majority in the European Parliament says the Commission has watered down the promotion of gender equality by only publishing a working paper instead of a full strategy for the years 2016-2020.


The centre-left coalition passed the resolution calling for a complete strategy on gender equality in early February 2016. The move was controversial, as the biggest parliamentary group, the European People’s Party (EPP) voted largely against it, criticising the centre-left’s demand for more legislation before current laws were fully implemented. The European Union recognises equality between men and women as a fundamental value and objective. The principle of “equal pay for equal work” was already included in the Treaty of Rome in 1957.

The Union has the responsibility to introduce legislation to fight against gender-based discrimination and is committed to promoting the principle of gender equality. Although inequalities still exist, the EU has made significant progress over the last decades. The working document focuses on five priority areas: “Increasing female labour market participation and equal economic independence, reducing the gender pay, earnings and pension gaps and thus fighting poverty among women; promoting equality between women and men in decision-making; combating gender based-violence, including tracking in human beings and protecting and supporting victims; promoting gender equality and women’s rights across the world.” Furthermore, the text underlines the need to include a gender equality perspective into all EU policies and funding programmes.

Analysis of the vote

EuropeWatch-SeatsPerPoliticalGroupThe left-leaning parliamentary majority, consisting of the Social Democrats (S&D), the Radical Left (GUE/NGL), the Greens and the Liberals (ALDE) voted in favour the resolution on gender equality and women’s rights in the Parliaments February Plenary session. The main group of the Parliament is that the Commission has until now just passed a working document. “It is very disappointing to see that the Commission thinks gender equality in the EU only deserves a staff working-document instead of proper comprehensive strategy,” said Angelika Mlinar of ALDE. The critique of ALDE is surprising, as the responsible commissioner Vera Jourova is a member of the same party grouping. Ms. García Pérez chair of the Women’s Rights and Gender Quality Committee (FEMM) and member of the S&D group, stated the European Commission was avoiding its responsibilities. “Why did the Commission not adopt a new communication publicly and transparently designed to help deliver equality between women and men?” said Garcia Perez.

-EuropeWatch-VotesInFavourComeFromLeft wing parties had equally strong words, with Malin Björk (GUE/NGL) calling for a more feminist Europe. “The Commission is now blocking the development of a gender strategy; this is evidence of autocracy and patriarchal arrogance. […] It’s time to throw the patriarchal yoke away.”

The Greens called women’s rights “the unfinished business of the 21st century”. In the end, the resolution was adopted with 337 votes in favour, 286 against and 73 abstentions. A Left/Right voting split is no exception on social policies. The vote further painted an interesting picture of political group cohesion in parliament. Social Democrats, Greens and the Radical Left voted almost entirely in favour, noting justEuropeWatch-FinalVote three abstentions on the Left’s side. The Eurosceptic side was more muddled, with a large part of the ECR and EFDD groups choosing to abstain rather than to oppose. The EPP managed to keep three quarters of its MEPs in line, with 11 EPP members opting to vote in favour, 25 abstaining and 168 voting against (it is worth mentioning that these issues are treated as ‘free voting’ in the EPP, i.e. the Members are encouraged to vote according to their conscience).

Photo credit:© Botond Horvath / Shutterstock, Inc.
Graphics: ©Polydea



Find all related publications

A European feminist foreign policy?

The need for a progressive and transformative approach

Women CSO leaders for systemic change

How to support feminist leadership in Europe

Bridging the gender pay gap in the Western Balkans?

A country case study of Croatia, North Macedonia, Serbia and Slovenia

‘Abortion in the EU’ – Country fact sheets

Multispeed access to abortion across member states
Find all related events
Online (Closed door)

Feminist Foreign Policy Collective Voices meeting

Feminist approach to EU Strategic Foresight
Budapest, Hungary

How to pursue gender equality in the context of right wing, authoritarian regimes?

The cases of Hungary and Serbia
Barcelona, Spain

Accelerating progress

Towards a feminist future of work, without violence against women and from a European perspective
Find all related news

FEPS attends the 68th annual Commission on the Status of Women (CSW68)


Discover the updated EU Care Atlas!


Call for tender – FFP Research and network coordinator

This call for tender is now closed.

Call for submissions – FFPPVC policy brief series

This call for tender closed on 16/02/2024
Find all related in the media
In the media

FEPS President on Euronews talk-show ‘Brussels, my love?’

by Euronews 16/03/2024
FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues discusses NATO expansions and elections in Russia and Portugal on Euronews talk-show ‘Brussels, my love?‘

A credible future beyond growth has to be feminist

by euobserver 17/05/2023
Euobserver article about the #BeyondGrowth conference mentions FEPS 'Defining Care' Policy Brief

Pay transparency can help close the gender pay gap but at what cost?

by Euronews 31/08/2022

How many inequalities can the world fight at the same time?

by Social Europe 07/07/2022