Mind the Gap: populism and gender

A strong focus on social issues in order to counteract socioeconomic inequalities can win back the female vote.

09/04/2019

The challenge for Progressive forces to regain their constituencies calls for a revigorated focus on social issues in order to counteract socioeconomic inequalities. Bear in mind that most citizens are women!

Since the 1990s, the gender gap in voting behaviour have been realigning in advanced industrial societies with women being more left-wing than men owing to structural and cultural trends. In the context of the recent surge of populism, this finding has been consistently reconfirmed with men more likely than women to vote for the Populist Radical Right (PRR).

Different determinants of such a behaviour have been explored in the emerging literature on gender and populism, but no consistent cross-country pattern has emerged yet. In addition, recent evidence reveals that the gender gap in voting for the PRR is narrowing in some European countries, while results of the March 2018 Italian parliamentary election showed that women voted for Lega Nord even more than men (17.6% of women compared to 17.1% of men).

Against the background of growing electoral support for populist parties in the European Union, the role of women’s voting behaviour will be crucial in the upcoming European Parliament elections. That is why, in the framework of the “Minerva Project”, carried out by FEPS and Associazione “Economia Civile”, we have investigated the role of several key determinants of populist support (namely nativism, Euroscepticism and anti-austerity attitudes) in explaining the evolving voting behaviour of European citizens (female as well as male).

According to Eurobarometer data, the opposition to migration is the main issue associated to voting for the PRR in Europe. European public opinion data do not reveal any gender pattern here, while the opposition to migration (captured in terms of statements of negative feelings about migration from EU and extra EU countries, disagreement about immigrant contribution to the country of residence, and dissent about improved help to refugees) rather seems to be mostly fuelled by low educational attainment and unemployment.

However, for both women and men, nativism is an essential reason for populist support and a European progressive policy response should try to affect the media agenda on migration concentrating on potential benefits of migration flows (e.g., the improved tax base and subsequent welfare expenditure) on which women seems to be more responsive.

The combination of leftist economic policy and nativist ideology is a winning formula for the Populist Radical Right.

The opposition to the European integration process has served as a major driver of assembling previously marginal populist political forces. Combining the different attitudes of mistrust towards the EU collected in Eurobarometer (mistrust towards major EU institutions, the negative image of the EU, disagreement on the EU’s capacity to create jobs, and dissatisfaction on the way democracy works in the EU), we find consistent greater intensity of Euroscepticism amongst those belonging to the working class, with men more likely than women to manifest opposition to the European integration across all social classes.

Euroscepticism is often combined with a revival of economic nationalism in PRR policy platforms. A definite identification of populist economic policy is still controversial mostly due to their gradual shift from neoliberalism to welfare chauvinism. In this context anti-austerity positions are crucial. Data show that European voters with self-defined left-wing political views are more likely to endorse anti-austerity positions. However, the combination of leftist economic policy and nativist ideology is a winning formula for PRR parties, increasing their capacity to attract voters from the lower to middle level of education.

Thus, the challenge for progressive forces of regaining their constituency calls for a reinvigorated focus on social issues in order to counteract socioeconomic inequalities and target all those European citizens affected by contemporary social insecurity, such as job insecurity, low or unequal pay, lack of care facilities, and unaffordable housing. Bearing in mind that most of these citizens are women.

Find all related publications
Publications
26/09/2023

‘Abortion in the EU’ – Country fact sheets

Multispeed access to abortion across member states
26/09/2023

Abortion in the European Union

Actors, issues and discourse
08/03/2023

The European Care Strategy

A chance to ensure inclusive care for all?
03/03/2023

Spotlight on the political groups as gender equality actors

Struggles over issues of gendered violence in the European Parliament
Find all related events
Events
Upcoming
10/10/2023
Online

Enhancing sustainable long-term care

Care4Care Policy Series
Past
25 - 26/08/2023
Korčula, Croatia (Hybrid)

Korčula School 2023

Transforming politics through a gender lens
06/09/2023
Online

Care as a driver of sustainable growth

Care4Care Policy Series
Find all related news
News
08/09/2023

The Feminist Foreign Policy Progressive Voices Collective (FFPPC)

A collective to promote a feminist and progressive approach to foreign policy
23/05/2023

A credible future beyond growth has to be feminist

This article was first published on EUobserver
25/04/2023

Feminist Leadership for Women in CSOs

Survey for women in leadership
20/02/2023

When will European women start earning the same as men?

Spoiler alert: that day hasn’t arrived yet
Find all related in the media
In the media

A credible future beyond growth has to be feminist

by euobserver 17/05/2023
Euobserver article about the #BeyondGrowth conference mentions FEPS 'Defining Care' Policy Brief

Pay transparency can help close the gender pay gap but at what cost?

by Euronews 31/08/2022

How many inequalities can the world fight at the same time?

by Social Europe 07/07/2022

Rebutting the assaults on gender equality

by Social Europe 08/03/2022