Trump Has (Some) Valid Concerns on Trade, But His Strategy is Counterproductive

One of Trump first acts in office was to withdraw the U.S. from TPP negotiations.


In the middle of 2016, something unprecedented happened on the US political scene. All three leading candidates for the presidency – Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and (until his concession in July) Bernie Sanders – were critics of “neoliberal” trade policies that put rentier profits above jobs and the real economy.


Their emphases differed, but all three promised breaks with the immediate past – including in their shared opposition to the 12-nation, Obama-negotiated Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). These positions came as a growing body of academic research shows how trade policies have left many U.S. regions permanently behind.

Fast forward to January 23, 2017. Trump had shocked the political establishment with his victory, and one of his first acts in office was to withdraw the U.S. from TPP negotiations. Yet despite much handwringing over the president’s rhetoric, his actual policy was just as, if not more, conventional than what a Sanders or Clinton presidency would have delivered. On top of her TPP opposition, Clinton had long called for reform of U.S. screening of inbound foreign direct investment, more muscular use of Section 301 penalties on countries like China that fail to protect intellectual property, more tariffs for enforcement purposes, and reviews every five years of trade agreements like NAFTA. Clinton may have even gone further than Trump (who has done nothing) on crafting rules to stop currency policies like those China used in the past.

On May 31 this year, he imposed steel tariffs on close U.S. allies like Canada, who were exempted from similar measures under George W. Bush and Obama.

Nonetheless, there are some distinctly Trump-y ways of conducting trade policy. On May 31 this year, he imposed steel tariffs on close U.S. allies like Canada, who were exempted from similar measures under George W. Bush and Obama. On the one hand, this strengthens the economic and legal defensibility of the measures. Under both U.S. and international trade law, it is better to work towards the fullest achievement of economic security goals – rather than treat allies better than foes in a way that raises concerns about discrimination or arbitrariness. On the other, the move makes for awful geopolitics – as the administration found out at Canada’s G-7 meetings. This escalation will make it next to impossible for the U.S.’ neighbours to accede to Trump’s demands on the North American Free Trade Agreement 2.0 talks.

He also actively sidelines the other branches of government. His steel tariffs were imposed using Section 232 of U.S. trade law, which leaves little to any role for checks-and-balances by courts and Congress. Likewise, he has proposed going around Congress on NAFTA and threatened Chinese investment restrictions in a week when Congress is attempting to come to a bipartisan and more lasting framework. By antagonising his co-equal branches, Trump risks their shutting down his discretion on trade.

Even if unwise as a matter of policy, Trump’s confrontational antics are bearing political fruit among Republicans. A growing body of political science research shows a substantial overlap between voters anxious about loss of a majority white America and those who fear loss of American dominance over other countries. While there are methodological reasons to doubt the descriptive robustness of these findings about the world pre-2017, they’re rapidly becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy, as Republican voters rally to their party leader’s point of view – despite evidence that Trump’s tariffs are already economically hurting their interests.

In the medium run, Trump may have succeeded in reigniting Democrats’ appetite for internationalism – something that seemed unlikely in 2016. Indeed, among the people leading the charge against Trump’s tariffs is none other than democratic socialist Bernie Sanders – who just two years ago was being parodied by comedians for his close similarities to Trump on trade.  Moreover, major symposia have been dedicated to revitalising progressive engagement on labour rights and a wider range of economic issues than just trade. This positive consequence – though indirect – will be the one felt after this dark chapter in U.S. history passes.


Find all related publications

A European Health Union

A blueprint for generations

Making trade work for prosperity, people and planet

FEPS Primers series - Arancha González and Yanis Bourgeois

SDGs for all: Strategic scenarios

Earth4All system dynamics modelling of SDG progress

European perceptions of public programmes for zero unemployment

Online survey and qualitative interviews: The results
Find all related news

FEPS is recruiting 1 project officer

Notice of vacancy

FEPS President at the SDG Summit and United Nations General Assembly in New York

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues is in New York this week on the occasion of […]

Call for tender – Researcher on inflation

Basic Information Project    The profits-prices spiral: measures to avoid inflation  Partners   TASC (Ireland), Pietro Nenni Foundation (Italy)  […]

Call for tender – Research and analysis for the project “Progressive paths to rebuild Ukraine”

Basic Information Project Research “In search of a ‘lost generation’. Harnessing youth potential for post-war […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

‘SDG funding gap swells to $137trn’ New Policy Study from FEPS, together with Earth4All, to deliver a five-point plan for the SDGs.

by Edie 19/09/2023
The “SDGs for All” report emphasises that policymakers have the potential to significantly advance SDG implementation by the original 2030 deadline and beyond by enacting five “extraordinary turnarounds” that break away from current trends.

“Trade doesn’t work in isolation from good domestic policies” Interview to Arancha González

by Borderlex 19/09/2023
Interview to Arancha González, former Spanish foreign minister, who released together with FEPS the new book entitled 'The Trade Handbook: Making Trade Work for Prosperity, People and Planet'

AI to ‘determine course of global trade, jobs’ in near future

by The Financial Express 14/09/2023
The Financial Express's article focuses on the publication of FEPS Primer on Trade written by Arancha González Laya and Yanis Bourgeois

Un nuevo informe de prospectiva identifica las medidas políticas urgentes necesarias para volver a encarrilar los ODS

by Cope 14/09/2023
'New foresight report identifies urgent policy measures needed to get the SDGs back on track' Cope's article on the policy study 'SDGs for all: Strategic scenarios', published in collaboration with Earth4All