The Progressive Post

Austria’s Presidential Elections – A Vote Against Right-Wing Populism


Maybe 2016 wasn’t that bad after all. For the first time an avalanche of right-wing demagogues that was about to roll over Europe, could be stopped. For now. The result of Austria’s presidential campaign, the victory of the presidential candidate Alexander van der Bellen was not only a huge relief but also crucial for Austria and Europe. It marked a day where Austrian citizens voted against the shift towards an authoritarian state, it was a vote against right-wing populism and demagogues. One of the main motives for this was fear. Fear of those who stoke and fuel fear. Hence, a coalition throughout society brought together people across the political spectrum, as well as social or regional differences, with one goal: to safeguard common values such as tolerance and freedom and thereby prevent the institutionalisation of nationalistic ideologies. The driving force was the belief in Europe and European integration, the respect for the Rule of Law and human rights and a strong refusal of border fences and political isolation.

The rise of demagogues

Right-wing populists have held Austria hostage for 30 years, beginning with the rise of Jörg Haider. The political establishment has never managed to find proper answers to these developments. It has instead fallen for provocations, bashing the government. In fact, Austria has made remarkable progress these past three decades: we are one of the economically most successful, socially most stable and safest members of the European Union. Therefore, it is even more surprising to observe how politics has disconnected from the people and become a world of shallow political theatre and symbolism with the media being its stooge, echoing right-wing ideologies. These twisted realities hit a scared population. Like in many other industrialized countries, fear has become a social phenomenon: Austrians too are scared of losing their jobs, their savings, their social status, etc. And fear easily generates hate. In a state like this, people are prone to listen to demagogues who not only fuel the feeling of insecurity but also foster hatred and intolerance. One year of election campaign has poisoned the political climate even more.

Confronting each other

So, we did win this time, but feeling triumphant is more than inadequate. It is high time to seek conversation again, to talk to the people, if we want to prevent them from falling for simplified solutions and into a paranoid parallel world. It doesn’t mean that we have to talk like them. Nevertheless, we should talk to them; this means confronting and question them. And yes, it also means to listen to their answers, to listen to what they have to say, even if we won’t like it. But it is worth it. We have to bear in mind that not all of the voters are actually right wing, many of them feel neglected and left alone, the people long for attention, respect and justice. Being able to confront each other, to discuss our controversies, is a sign of strength and courage. Political movements are successful if they provide solutions that can be explained and understood. Austria’s Prime Minister Christian Kern and his “New Deal”-approach is a good start to give social democracy its profile back. We have to tackle issues again that were once the core of our policies but now seem to have been forgotten, such as the question of distributive justice.

Including civil society

The main success of this election though was the amount of volunteers that were mobilised. Without the help and support of civil society, Austria would have another President now. This is proof that people are not suffering from political fatigue. Thousands of volunteers throughout the country have proven that they want to play an active role and to participate. They have just been dissatisfied with the way politics has been organised so far. Let us draw our lessons from this election, let’s reflect on our modus operandi and show courage to bring about change. We have to discuss how we want our future to be, and therefore we need a widespread platform that includes everyone. That’s the only way we can overcome social rifts and promote mutual understanding.

Find all related publications

Digital regulatory power but technology taker

How do we create an ecosystem for the European digital model

Embracing Feminist Foreign Policy within EU strategic foresight capabilities


Building Economic Democracy in Europe

Concepts, Cases and Achieving Progressive Change

Responsibility-sharing or shifting?

New Pact Implementation series
Find all related news

FEPS Delegation attends T20/C20 Midterm Conference in Brazil


Join Tax the EU Billionaires Day!


The EUROPAEUM delegation visits FEPS


FEPS celebrates its annual General Assembly and welcomes new members

Find all related in the media
In the media

NATO-bővítés sok vitával: érvek, ellenérvek és lobbik a Clinton-elnökség idején

by BBC History 07/07/2024
"The controversial NATO enlargement: pros, cons and lobbying during the Clinton presidency" This article, written by FEPS Secretary General László Andor, looks back to the 1990s when the Eastern enlargement of NATO was requested, discussed, orchestrated, and eventually completed.

Falsely historic European elections bring little change, says FEPS

by Agence Europe 18/06/2024
Agence Europe's article features an analysis of the EU election results by Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Director for Research and Training, published in The Progressive Post.

Die EU-Osterweiterung nach 20 Jahren: Kann die Konvergenz sozial und wirtschaftlich nachhaltig gestaltet werden?

by Wirtschaftsdienst 13/06/2024
'EU Eastward Enlargement After 20 Years: Socially and Economically Sustainable Convergence?' FEPS Secretary General László Andor co-authored this article of the German journal Wirtschaftsdienst

Flere har en computer som chef: »Det dræber al gejst og motivation«

by Finans 12/06/2024
'Several people have a computer as their boss: "It kills all spirit and motivation" Finans article features FEPS latest policy study and survey 'Computer in command'