Climate Finance is the Cornerstone of the Paris Summit

We have talked a great deal about climate change over the past decade as a […]


We have talked a great deal about climate change over the past decade as a prospective issue. However, we must say it loudly: climate change is now.

In the Sahel region, between 1972 and 1984, droughts and desertification have brought about starvation and caused 100 000 deaths according to the UN. The number of climate refugees is growing consistently. There are 25 million persons every year according to a study of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. They might reach 200 million within the next decades.

Climate change is now!

These realities are the reasons why I believe a failure of the Paris Summit would be unacceptable. In this process, the European Union has to lead the way and to ensure that the agreement encompasses all sectors and all countries in the world: this is why climate finance is such a cornerstone. If we do not include a strong and solid financial package in the COP21, developing countries won’t be on board, and half of the world won’t commit against climate change.

At the European Parliament, I am in charge of the initiative report that gives recommendations in order to reach and universal, binding and effective agreement to stay below the 2 degrees target. The spirit of my report is simple: a strong European commitment against climate change and solid financial aid to support the most vulnerable countries facing this phenomenon.

A leading EU against climate change

The first step to become a leader is to behave like one. Thus, I demand ambitious CO2 reduction targets in my report for the European Union. A reduction of at least 40% by 2030 in comparison with 1990 levels and a reduction of 95% by 2050 – which can be seen as a comprehensive phase out. But the European parliament is going further than the European Council and its position adopted on September 19th: we call for a binding target for renewables – 30% of our energy consumption by 2030 should be made of renewables – and we call for a 40% energy efficiency by 2030.

These three targets should embody the European commitment against climate change. With lower targets, we will not be able to mitigate CO2 enough in Europe.

But to be frank, all the targets that developed countries can set will be of no use if an agreement is not reached by all the parties. All the targets without fresh money will not help the countries that are facing climate change right now.

Therefore my report puts forward the need for climate finance. It urges the parties to fund the Green Climate Fund in order to reach 100 billion dollars per year as of 2020. But we also need fresh money from innovative financing opportunities, for instance to define a proper carbon price so that it becomes cheaper to use eco-friendly technologies instead of most pollutant ones. Our EU Emission Trading System has already allowed the funding of innovative project such as “Nemo”: a thermal sea energy project that was made possible thanks to a 72 million euro funding. If a higher carbon price were to be set, we may find a lot more of other “Nemos”…

Another way to find fresh money is to enforce a Financial Transaction Tax in Europe. The enhanced cooperation by 11 Member States could make 35 million euros available every year. A part of its revenues should be allocated to the fight against climate change. My proposition was rejected by a very light majority, but the idea is making its way. I will keep on promoting it.

These are the ideas I promote and defend in my report that is still to be adopted on October 14th. The European Parliament is strongly committed to find a comprehensive agreement in Paris. The failure in Copenhagen is not an option anymore. The Paris Summit is not a conference to discuss but a conference to decide!

Find all related publications

Towards a renewables scale-up that works for nature

Recovery Watch series

Improving territorial justice

Transparency, inclusiveness, capacity building and strategy in the Territorial Just Transition Plans

Fairness and acceptability of environmental externality pricing in Europe

Environmental externality pricing has been long promoted to address environmental problems. The theoretical advantages of […]

The road to a just transition

A comparative analysis of Territorial Just Transition Plans
Find all related events

Silver Rose Awards 2023

Award ceremony and reception
Valladolid, Spain (Expert meeting)

Coming together for a Just Transition

Linking climate action and social justice in Europe
Brussels, Belgium

Beyond Growth Conference

Pathways towards Sustainable Prosperity in the EU
Find all related news

A new social contract for the well-being of people and the planet

Call to action on Just Transition

New study on how and why social issues have increased in prominence during the EP negotiations

Progress towards inclusive economic transition but need for further improvements in terminology and framing of vulnerable groups

New manifesto giving international impetus to Lula da Silva’s environmental policy

FEPS President, among the 50 scientists and former politicians from Brazil and Portugal who signed the manifesto

FEPS delegation at COP27

FEPS delegation was present at COP27, with the strategic objectives of mobilizing climate finance for […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

Just Transition: A new social contract for wellbeing of people and planet

by Euractiv 11/07/2023
Euractiv's article ahead of the high-level expert meeting on Just Transition in Valladolid, organized by FEPS, Solidar, and other think tanks and civil society organizations.

A szmogtól és a mikroműanyagoktól rettegő magyarok akkor vehetők rá a zöldítésre, ha egyénileg jól járnak

by Qubit 22/05/2023
'Hungarians who fear smog and microplastics can be persuaded to go green if they are doing well individually' article about FEPS policy study 'Talking green in Hungary'Hungary', in collaboration with Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and Policy Solutions

Magyarországon már kínos lett a “rezsicsökkentés”

by Népszava 22/05/2023
'"Utility reduction" has already become embarrassing in Hungary' Népszava article about FEPS policy study 'Talking green in Hungary', in collaboration with Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and Policy Solutions

Magyarokat kérdeztek a zöld kommunikációról

by 22/05/2023
'Why do garbage collectors throw selectively collected waste into one? Hungarians were asked about green communication' Extensive article about FEPS policy study 'Talking Green in Hungary', in collaboration with Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and Policy Solutions