The Progressive Post

Food prices are high. Why are farmers angry?

Policy Analyst on Economy

Last week, farmers’ protests swept Brussels, blocking the European district and crashing Place
Luxembourg in front of the European Parliament. The protests were also happening in other
countries: France, Italy and earlier in January in Germany. The range of farmers’ complaints is
wide: red tape from the EU and governments, the EU Green Deal, high fuel and fertiliser prices and
competition from cheap imports. Many say they are being squeezed, as they struggle to pass the
input cost increases on to their customers – food manufacturers and retailers – amid depressed
wholesale prices. Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo said EU leaders tasked their
agriculture ministers to devise a plan to reduce the administrative burden by the Agriculture
Council on 26 February. Though very welcome, this step is clearly not enough.

There is an obvious contradiction in the situation: how come farmers are squeezed while food prices
have increased so much? The food value chain is extremely distorted. The whole value chain,
including food processing, trading, shipping, storage and financing is highly concentrated. For
example, four companies, so-called ABCD – Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM), Bunge, Cargill and
Dreyfus – control 70-90 per cent of the world grain market. In 2021-2022 these companies made
stellar profits (see the Figure below).

On top of controlling the food supply chain, these companies engage in speculation on the food
commodity markets, without being regulated. Most of them conduct their food trading activities in
Switzerland, where they enjoy a lax tax regime.
Notably, in Europe, most food commodity
derivatives trading (95 per cent) takes place over-the-counter, that is, almost unregulated. Then
there is the global fertiliser market, which is also highly concentrated and controlled by a handful of
companies. For instance, just four companies control 33 per cent of all nitrogen fertiliser production.
Their profits also shoot out in 2021-2022, driving the profit margins to a massive 36 per cent in 2022.

This is where all the ‘upside’ of food price inflation ended up. Farmers likely benefited from the
price surge initially, when wholesale commodity prices shot up, but their gain was limited due to
high energy and fertiliser costs.
Now that the wholesale food prices are falling for almost a year,
farmers find themselves particularly squeezed.

To mend the situation, serious reform of the food sector is needed. The immediate first step is to
limit the speculation in the food commodity markets.
Food commodity price volatility cannot be
totally avoided, as shocks happen because of adverse natural conditions. The 2021-2022 food price
shock was triggered by high energy prices, the war in Ukraine and adverse weather conditions in
Europe. But these factors do not explain the wild fluctuations in wholesale prices. As the United
Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) shows in its 2023 TDR report, there was a
clear link to commodity speculation. This problem is not new, and after the food price shock in 2008,
some measures have been taken to regulate commodity trading, but obviously not enough. There is
no lack of good proposals (for example, from the European Economic and Social Committee, EESC)
on how to protect food prices from speculative attacks, including the prohibition for index funds to
invest in food commodities, the introduction of a financial transaction tax on operations with
commodity derivatives and others. To smoothen the shocks, state strategic reserves in basic foods
need to be created or increased.

The second major stream of work must deal with the de-monopolisation of the food supply chain.
This means stricter merger control, especially for vertical integration. Price-gauging practices must
be punished. The state needs to facilitate new entrants in the whole value chain – in fertilisers,
processing and shipping. The challenge with fighting monopolisation in the food value chain is that
the companies operating in it are international. Trying to break their monopoly power at a single-

state level will have only limited success. Much more can be done at the EU level, using its
competition policy. Ultimately, however, there is a need for a global mechanism to enforce

Third, the whole concept of industrial agriculture needs to be rethought. The industrial mode of
agricultural production, with its focus on monocultures, makes it more vulnerable to adverse
weather events, weeds and pests. This makes agriculture energy-intensive and dependent on
pesticides, not to speak of its massive harm to the environment and human health. The
recommendation to move away from this mode of food production is also not new, and many
alternative farms have been pursuing more natural ways of production. The current crisis points to
the need to speed up this transition.

As a very basic first step, the transparency of food prices and of the value added all along the value
chain needs to be increased, especially for food processing companies. The Eurostat statistics on
profits also need to be enhanced: they are published once per year and with a huge delay – as of
February 2024, its most recent data on corporate profits was for 2022, uploaded in November 2023.

Coming back to the farmers, their frustration is being used by all sorts of political actors who tell
them that it is ‘Brussels and the Green Deal’ that must be blamed for their plight.
Clearly, Brussels
has work to do, not curbing the Green Deal, but getting serious about fighting speculation and
monopolistic practices in the food value chain.

Photo credits: Michailidis

Find all related publications

The real effects of Next Generation EU

Recovery Watch Series

Tightening welfare belts again?


Toward a progressive geopolitical EU


How can RepowerEU consolidate recovery?

Recovery Watch series
Find all related events
Brussels, Belgium

The transformative power of economic democracy

Towards democratic practices in public spending, the workplace, urban planning and public services
FEPS HQ (Expert meeting)

Social Europe in the new EU Economic Governance framework

Integrating social investment & social policy actors
Szeged, Hungary

Taxing the richest in the EU

For a just, social and green transition in Hungary
Find all related news

FEPS President at Euronews talk-show ‘Brussels, my love?’


Economic Democracy

FEPS launches an initiative on Economic Democracy

Tax the rich

A European Citizens' Initiative

Call for tender – Researcher on inflation

This call for tender closed on 03/10/23
Find all related in the media
In the media

Orbánov boj z zunanjim sovražnikom ni bil kos inflaciji

by DELO 28/05/2024
In an article in Delo, László Andor criticises Viktor Orbán government's economic policies, such as not allowing Hungary to join the euro area, which he believes would have helped curb inflation. He also criticises the government for blaming external enemies such as the President of the European Commission, to cover up its own failures.

Ex-EU-Kommissar Andor: Orbán gerät an die Peripherie

by Austria Presse Agentur 28/05/2024
"Former EU Commissioner Andor: Orbán is relegated to the periphery" Austrian news agency APA interviewed FEPS Secretary General László Andor on Europe's political situation ahead of the upcoming EU elections.

Ласло Андор: Европа трябва да създаде нов модел за икономически растеж

by 14/03/2024
'Europe must create a new model for economic growth'. Interview by Laszlo Andor, FEPS Secretary General

FEPS President at Euronews talk-show ‘Brussels, my love?’

by Euronews 15/01/2024
Panellists discussed topics including EU fiscal rules reform, German farmer's protests, and the decision of Charles Michel to quit his job early to run for MEP.