The Progressive Post

Increase quality to boost competitiveness – don’t cut wages

Gaining competitiveness should rather be done by increasing quality than by lowering production costs.


Regaining export competitiveness through reduction of production costs, – that is mainly by cutting wages – is socially painful and potentially ineffective. Focussing on higher added-value products and better quality is the way to a sustainable long-term strategy to become more competitive on the global market.


In some cases, internal devaluation can be a desirable approach to restoring competitiveness. For example, the Baltic states preferred internal devaluation to breaking their currency peg in the aftermath of the financial crisis. However, there are some limitations to the effectiveness of wage adjustments as a means to regain competitiveness.

First, lower production costs are not necessarily passed through final prices, as they could be reflected in higher profit margins. When wage adjustments are imposed, the margins of firms should be controlled. Additionally, if prices fall less than wages do, domestic demand, and thus growth, can be negatively impacted.

Second, lower internal prices do not necessarily improve export performance. There is mixed evidence of the association between cost-competitiveness and higher exports. For example, the impact on exports may be minimal if most of the price adjustments are confined in non-tradable sectors.

Third, even if there is an increase in competitiveness, the social and political cost of internal devaluation may offset its benefits. The burden of adjustment falls on the population, who can see its (perceived) purchasing power and economic status deteriorate, especially if social benefits and high wages have been present for a long time.

Fourth, one should not forget that in a currency union the burden of adjustment should be symmetric. If some inflation was allowed in surplus countries, the resulting loss in competitiveness would bring higher gains from exports in deficit countries. The loss of some export volume in surplus countries would be offset by stronger the domestic demand deriving from higher wages, a win-win solution.

A long-term strategy in eurozone countries should focus on the non-price factors of competitiveness.

Beside the fact that even currency devaluation is a questionable policy to gain long-term competitiveness, internal devaluation cannot become ‘normality’ for countries in a monetary union. When assessing competitiveness, looking only at price factors, i.e. wages and final prices, can be misleading. A long-term strategy in eurozone countries should focus on the non-price factors of competitiveness.

Western countries are high-cost economies (e.g. labour and energy costs), and thus are vulnerable to the competition of low-cost emerging countries. Competitive advantage should thus be found in markets where low-cost competitors are not present. Export performance surely depends on the price of products but also, and significantly, on other factors such as product quality and preferences. Rather than cutting prices, eurozone countries trying to gain competitiveness should move towards more complex, higher added-value product markets. Upgrading the export basket implies moving towards high-quality and high technology and knowledge-intensity. Products with these characteristics are less price sensitive and can shelter the country’s exports from price competition.

Such long-term restructuring of the economy should come together with investment in human and technological capital, which is necessary for improving the quality of exports. Similarly, public policy should support the shift from an intermediate position in global value chains to an upper-end one, where the most added value is generated.

Wage adjustments are a socially-painful, potentially ineffective way of gaining competitiveness. Although improving cost-competitiveness can be useful, it cannot be a sustainable, long-term strategy in a global market where fierce competition from low-cost economies has become the norm. Eurozone countries looking for better export performance should engage in a long-term restructuring of the economy and upgrading of the export basket, gaining competitiveness from quality rather than prices.

Find all related publications

Responsibility-sharing or shifting?

New Pact Implementation series

Separation or divorce? The popular class and social democracy in Poland


The Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation: Towards future-proof crisis management and responses?

New Pact Implementation series

A Digital Union based on European values

FEPS Primer series - Ivana Bartoletti
Find all related news

FEPS celebrates its annual General Assembly and welcomes new members


FEPS represented at T20 Brasil International Advisory Council


FEPS at UN Civil Society Conference in Kenya


Notice of vacancy – Policy analyst on international relations

Find all related in the media
In the media

Falsely historic European elections bring little change, says FEPS

by Agence Europe 18/06/2024
Agence Europe's article features an analysis of the EU election results by Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Director for Research and Training, published in The Progressive Post.

Die EU-Osterweiterung nach 20 Jahren: Kann die Konvergenz sozial und wirtschaftlich nachhaltig gestaltet werden?

by Wirtschaftsdienst 13/06/2024
'EU Eastward Enlargement After 20 Years: Socially and Economically Sustainable Convergence?' FEPS Secretary General László Andor co-authored this article of the German journal Wirtschaftsdienst

Flere har en computer som chef: »Det dræber al gejst og motivation«

by Finans 12/06/2024
'Several people have a computer as their boss: "It kills all spirit and motivation" Finans article features FEPS latest policy study and survey 'Computer in command'

Un comisario de democracia para Europa

by Confidencial 11/06/2024
"A Democracy Commissioner for Europe". FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues co-authors this article, advocating for the establishment of a Democracy Commissioner.