The Progressive Post

Shared anger won’t help me pay my bills

Policy Officer, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Slovakia
29/11/2023

It should not be surprising that a country feeling like a ship in a storm without a captain elects the strongest protector. However, one should not forget that there is no way to build a sustainable welfare state through culture wars, hate, fear, homophobia and xenophobia. People deserve solutions instead of shared anger.

It is a sign of a healthy democracy, actually the very point of it, to accept the winner, even if we do not fully share his policies. The Slovak parliamentary elections produced a clear winner. The highest turnout in 20 years of 68.5 per cent means that the winner has a clear, democratic mandate and deserves a chance to build a government. From abroad it can appear as a shocker that a politician written off by most only four years ago would return for his 5th election victory. But not from inside. Counting together the abysmal appearance of the previous government, their disastrous way of communicating with society during the pandemic, and their implosion one year ago over never-ending internal fights, leaving the country without real leadership in times of ongoing war, energy crisis, skyrocketing inflation, it is not surprising that such a radical failure called for a radical answer.

In the case of Smer-SSD and Robert Fico, you could easily say, that luck – factors outside of his impact – met the most hardworking, the one with the biggest stamina. It is also called the survival of the toughest, the unyielding. And why should Slovakia – a country with such a high level of scepticism, frustration in the society, such high distrust in institutions and people, stagnating or degrading in crucial indicators of life quality and growth perspective – be the exception from a European right-wing or anti-systemic trend?

So much for the reasons. But there is a downside also, of course. There is an old saying in US-campaign vocabulary stating “we campaign in poetry, we govern in prose”. Adapted to the Slovak parliamentary elections we could ask: “can you calm the country after setting it on fire, metaphorically speaking, with a campaign based on fear and hate”? It speaks for itself, that the winners of the election, measured by better results than expected, were the parties running the most aggressive campaigns, and not coincidentally some of their leading figures have been involved in a physical fight, one that pitted the former prime minister against the former minister of interior, live on camera. Elections are, by definition, not feasts of rational discourse, emotions are its essence. However, in a country with these big challenges, people deserve much more than shouting, name-calling, hate speech and amplified anger. The question of whether the people we elected can switch from a tribal warfare mentality to a 100 per cent focus on issues our country has to solve, will finally decide the fate of Slovakia for the next decade. They would be well advised to realise, that you cannot run a country, especially in these difficult times, in a permanent mode of campaigning on steroids.

This brings us to the second disturbing feature of the Slovak elections, relevant especially from a Social Democratic perspective. We should not be surprised, and the ‘western’ S&D family would be well advised to accept, that Social Democracy in central-eastern Europe will always, or for a long time come, be more conservative and more nationalist. Such are the times, such are our societies, and such is our self-understanding as younger, less affluent, disadvantaged, sometimes feeling discriminated against or not listened to by the members of the European family. However, the fact is that the level of cultural warfare, especially homo- and xenophobia in Slovak politics is debilitating and counterproductive for the mission, that Social Democracy has to aim for primarily, wherever it is operating. Lifting people out of social hardship, helping them master the permanent insecurities of current times and building a sustainable welfare state, brick by brick, reform by reform, is its mission.

When this mission is intentionally overshadowed by ultra-conservative culture warfare and liberalism bashing, because of its better online virality and reach, then one clearly fails in his mission. Forgetting that oligarchy, social inequality and poverty, unbounded capitalism and its libertarian apostles are the villains we should fight against, and not gays, feminists or climate activists. Never in history and nowhere on earth did cultural warfare, hate and homo- or xenophobia help build a functioning welfare state, and support people in hard times. It is a dead end for Social Democracy, be it in the West, the East, the North or the South. And when, if not in these times of polycrisis and omnipresent social anxiety is a better time to postulate the agenda of a capable, agile, investing and redistributing welfare state, protecting and helping people in uneasy times as the main dividing line of political conflict for the years ahead? This conflict line is good politics, and it clearly is good policy. Especially in a state with these huge challenges ahead, the necessity of a new growth model, sustainable and socially balanced climate and energy policies, and massive regional development, in a state where a well-functioning public sector, from health to education, public transport, regional development, social services, housing affordability and so on, offers plenty of room for improvement. ‘Our people’, as the head of the Austrian SPÖ uses to call them, people without wealth and privilege deserve solution politics to improve their chances for a good life. Shared or amplified anger brings exactly zero benefits to their everyday lives. And for that matter, anger and blame gaming is the worst government programme one could imagine. So whatever government coalition the post-election negotiations produce, our country and its representatives, should, mentally and physically, switch from campaigning to solution mode. In the end, that is what they are paid for.

*The expressed opinions represent the personal views of the author, not of Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Slovakia.

Photo credits: Shutterstock/ bwagner99

Find all related publications
Publications
24/01/2024

Progressive Yearbook 2024

Looking back to look ahead
18/07/2019

To inspire Europe

Insights from the success story of social democracy in Spain
29/05/2019

The European elections 2019: 10 observations on how they made a difference and will resonate further on

Find all related events
Events
Past
11/06/2024
Online

Analytical Conference – Progressive Pollsters Network

The European Elections 2024: the expected, the unexpected and the path forward
04/04/2024
FEPS HQ (Expert meeting)

Ahead and beyond the elections

What are the major European political and social trends in 2024
21/03/2024
European Parliament (Hybrid)

The likely political and policy consequences of the EP 2024 elections

Next Left Lecture IV with Prof. Simon Hix
Find all related news
News
04/03/2024

FEPS at the PES Election Congress in Rome

Find all related in the media
In the media

Total honesty and far-right lies

by IPS Journal 04/12/2023
Dive into the insightful analysis published in IPS Journal by Tom Theuns, Assist. Prof at Leiden University, and László Andor, FEPS Secretary General, examining the Dutch election results and the conclusions that need to be drawn for a successful EU Integration