The antechambers of decisions in the EU

The Parliament will reject the multiannual financial framework unless there is an agreement on own resources, unless the necessary financial means are achieved.


The multiannual financial framework (MFF), the EU’s long-term budget, sets the limits for EU spending, as a whole and for different areas of activity, over a period of seven years. Its main purpose is to align EU spending with the block’s political priorities. So it’s crucial that the Union has its political priorities set and clear, and that these are aligned with the citizens objectives and enabling us to deliver on their expectations.

When compared with previous negotiations, today, the European Parliament (EP) has a more prominent and active role. After the European elections however, the EP is more fragmented But it is united and fully committed to deliver on a strong and credible MFF. Most recent public declarations of EP President David Sassoli have been quite strong and they show that today the European Parliament is an active player that shall not be disregarded.

Our political objectives are clear and were transmitted by citizens during the electoral campaign: fighting climate change and embracing a digital and environmental transition in a socially fair way were the key Europeans’ concerns. We need a more prosperous, safe and cohesive Europe. A Union able to deliver on security, on job creation, on fighting unemployment and the skilling of youth. A Union that increases mobility in education and universities, promotes public and private investment, ensures cohesion and convergence, fosters research, development and innovation among all the sectors in the economy. Last, but not least, a Union that could have a stronger role in the World with stronger partnerships and with one voice.

Parliament has pursued two main objectives in the current negotiations: to establish the right level of appropriations that adequately finance the Union’s political ambitions, policies and programmes; and to create new own resources to the Union’s budget. 

The Parliament knows it will accomplish its political objectives only if we manage to maintain the same level of funding in real terms for agriculture, fisheries and cohesion policies. We request the necessary funding for flagship programmes in the areas of youth, research and innovation, the environment and climate transition, infrastructure, digitalisation, social rights, migration, external action security and defence.

Besides this, the MFF has recently been called to finance the new commitments of the European Commission political agenda such as the European Green Deal, the Digital transition, and the stronger presence of the EU in the global scene. These imply a significant financial commitment from the Union’s budget, for which fresh appropriations are crucial. Those are ambitions and priorities explicitly stated by the European Leaders. They need to put the money where their mouth is.

The Parliament also asks the Council to come to an agreement on the reform of the EU own resources system, including the introduction of a basket of new own resources, and end this nearly only GNI based budget. It is time to base new own resources on the benefits of the single market, or on the common challenges at European level, such as climate change. On the aftermath of Brexit, the Parliament also demands the end of rebates and its non-ending tale. What is clear today, nearly on the eve of the special European Council decisive for the next MFF, is that the Parliament will say ‘no’ and reject the MFF unless there is an agreement on own resources. The Parliament will also say ‘no’ unless the necessary financial means are achieved. The political landscape today is not the “fait accompli” by the leaders behind the doors of the Council anymore.

Find all related publications

Social Europe: From vision to vigour

FEPS Primer series - Björn Hacker

The macro-economic impact of the cost crisis

Lessons for Europe

The political economy of migration policies

During the Covid-19 pandemic, the question of migration across the EU has been somehow downplayed. […]

EU Treaties – Why they need targeted changes

An approach based on European public goods, citizenship and democracy
Find all related news

Economic Democracy

FEPS has launched an initiative on Economic Democracy

Ann Linde is FEPS’ new Foreign Affairs Special Advisor

Ann Linde, former Minister for Foreign Affairs of Sweden, becomes Special Advisor on Foreign Affairs […]

Tax the rich

A European Citizens' Initiative

The EU at the time of the New Cold War

A manifesto signed by FEPS President and FEPS Secretary General
Find all related in the media
In the media

Ukrainas och Europas framtid diskuterades i Helsingfors

by Demokraatti 01/12/2023
'Future of Ukraine and Europe discussed in Helsinki' Demokraatti article about FEPS and Kalevi Sorsa Foundation event 'From Russia’s aggression to progressive recovery of Ukraine' held in Helsinki.

Um conclave pelo futuro da Europa

by Diario de Noticias 27/11/2023
Maria João Rodrigues participated in the 'Conclave' on the future of Europe. A transdisciplinary forum that discussed the essential questions to be asked and the answers to be given to European leaders.

Une réforme de l’UE qui intéressera forcément les Suisses

by Le Temps 24/11/2023
'EU reform bound to be of interest to the Swiss', an opinion piece in Le Temps on EU Treaties changes by Maria João Rodrigues, FEPS President, Guillaume Klossa, Director of think tank EuropaNova and Daniela Schwarzer, Executive board member Bertelsmann Stiftung

« Le moment est venu de lancer un débat sur la réforme de l’Union européenne »

by Le Monde 22/11/2023
'The time has come to launch a debate on the reform of the European Union', an opinion piece in Le Monde on Eu Treaties changes by Maria João Rodrigues, FEPS President, Guillaume Klossa, Director of think tank EuropaNova and Daniela Schwarzer, Executive board member Bertelsmann Stiftung