The Progressive Post

The Impact of the Irish ‘Non-Brexit’ Election

While Brexit was a non-issue in the Irish general election, considerable challenges emerge from it.

Lecturer in Politics at Technological University Dublin

While Brexit was a non-issue in the Irish general election, considerable challenges emerge from it.

While the Withdrawal Agreement of the UK from the European Union facilitated Boris Johnson’s ability to win the 2019 British general election through consolidating the Leave vote, it hampered the prospects of the Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar only two months later.

“Following the British General election, Brexit fell down from the first to the third most important issue.”

This is because Brexit, as an issue, subsided in importance for the Irish electorate following the UK General Election. Polling company Ask Europe had asked respondents what they thought to be the most important issue over the last three years and on each occasion 20 to 30% cited Brexit as the most important issue, second only to the issue of Housing. However, following the British General election, perceptions of the importance of the issue fell to 5%, down to the third most important issue.

January is a time of the year where pressures on the health service are more acute and the public is more aware of the issue of homelessness. As such, healthcare and housing were the two big issues in focus for the main parties.

An exit poll has remained that Brexit is significant.

That is not to say that Brexit is not considered to be important, rather that the immediate issues of Housing and Healthcare were more prominent in this time horizon. Brexit will invariably return as a prominent issue, not least as a result of the upcoming negotiations of the EU-UK trade agreement and the Irish domestic businesses. An exit poll reveals that a significant majority believe that Brexit will have a negative or very negative impact on the economy. There remains therefore the recognition that Brexit is significant.

Under 50

It is unclear at this point what the next government will look like and indeed the prospects of another election is also a serious possibility. One proposition is that Sinn Féin, Fianna Fáil and the Green Party would form a coalition government. This might make sense if Fianna Fáil were significantly larger than Sinn Féin. However, the two parties are almost tied on 37 and 38 seats, making it unclear who would lead the next government. Although they may be an appropriate match on policy grounds, there is significant distrust in Fianna Fáil of Sinn Féin. 

One of the big issues in this election was the rise of Sinn Féin, particularly among those aged under 50. The scale of this surge was unexpected. The party had lost half of its seats in the local council elections only months prior to the general election and it also performed relatively poorly in a series of by-elections that occurred in November. In both cases and indeed in the recent presidential election and previous general election, the party underperformed relative to its share of the vote in public opinion polls. The party lost half of its seats in the local council elections only months previous to the general election. It was only when the election campaign had begun that the party recognised its fortunes had improved. Achieving 24.5% of the vote was quite unexpected and what constrained the party was the fact that it only selected 42 candidates.

Critically, the presence of Sinn Féin, due to its association with the past, particularly with the IRA, may make it more difficult to reconcile North and South (Ireland and Northern Ireland) and East and West (Ireland and the UK). Arguably, it is difficult to reconcile differences between the two communities in Northern Ireland without reconciling any differences between the two Islands of Ireland and Britain.

For the Labour Party, the future is brighter than it was before the election.

In 2016, the Labour Party had been part of an unpopular coalition government for five years. It had been charged with the task of cutting the country’s enormous deficit in line with the European ‘bailout’ agreement. In the 2016 election, it lost 30 out of its 37 seats – retaining only the most senior members. However these  experienced members of this group of parliamentarians were tainted among some voters by their time in office, thereby creating extra difficulties. While the party lost a further seat in the 2020 election, it’s future is somewhat brighter as there has been a significant change in the personnel and a couple of younger candidates have been elected. The Social Democrats also performed well, winning six seats, on a lower vote share than the Labour Party. One significant issue for the two parties in the weeks ahead is how they might cooperate. 

Find all related publications

Climate progress in the EU and the world

FEPS Primer series - Stephen Minas

Digital regulatory power but technology taker

How do we create an ecosystem for the European digital model

Embracing Feminist Foreign Policy within EU strategic foresight capabilities


Building Economic Democracy in Europe

Concepts, Cases and Achieving Progressive Change
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post

Less is more: time to re-purpose the European Political Community?


After the general election, France in a political conundrum


Le Pen’s delayed victory

Find all related news

FEPS Delegation attends T20/C20 Midterm Conference in Brazil


Join Tax the EU Billionaires Day!


The EUROPAEUM delegation visits FEPS


FEPS celebrates its annual General Assembly and welcomes new members

Find all related in the media
In the media

Eurozone Finance Ministers to talk belt tightening

by POLITICO 15/07/2024
FEPS Secretary General László Andor discusses the rise of supply-side progressivism following the success of the Labour Party in the UK Elections with POLITICO

NATO-bővítés sok vitával: érvek, ellenérvek és lobbik a Clinton-elnökség idején

by BBC History 07/07/2024
"The controversial NATO enlargement: pros, cons and lobbying during the Clinton presidency" This article, written by FEPS Secretary General László Andor, looks back to the 1990s when the Eastern enlargement of NATO was requested, discussed, orchestrated, and eventually completed.

Falsely historic European elections bring little change, says FEPS

by Agence Europe 18/06/2024
Agence Europe's article features an analysis of the EU election results by Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Director for Research and Training, published in The Progressive Post.

Die EU-Osterweiterung nach 20 Jahren: Kann die Konvergenz sozial und wirtschaftlich nachhaltig gestaltet werden?

by Wirtschaftsdienst 13/06/2024
'EU Eastward Enlargement After 20 Years: Socially and Economically Sustainable Convergence?' FEPS Secretary General László Andor co-authored this article of the German journal Wirtschaftsdienst