The Progressive Post

On the Campaign Trail

senior fellow in the Liberty and Security Project of the Center for American Progress, a multi-issue progressive think tank in Washington DC. He has previously worked for the Labour Party and the Institute for Public Policy Research.
13/10/2016

American presidential politics has crossed a Rubicon. In the span of 48 hours, the United States government formally accused Russia of directly interfering in the presidential election, an 11 year old video was released showing Donald Trump bragging about committing sexual assault, Trump held a media event with women who accuse Bill Clinton of sexual assault, and then Trump pledged he would put Hillary Clinton in jail if he won the presidency. This is Banana Republic territory. As much as it pains me to accept, this campaign has been harmful to our democracy, the fabric of our society, and to the United States’ standing in the world. Fortunately, it’s only four weeks until Election Day.

Given how close we are to the end of the campaign, the reality that Clinton holds a commanding lead is extremely significant. No presidential candidate in the history of modern polling has overturned a deficit of at least four points in October. The polling averages now show that Clinton holds a six or seven point lead, and that includes many polls taken before the Trump tape was released, after which most polls give Clinton around a 10 point lead. There is always a first time for everything, and this election is so unpredictable that it is a good idea to be cautious about predictions. But Clinton’s position now appears insurmountable.

Part of the reason she seems in such a strong position is that the Trump campaign is now clearly pursuing a strategy focused on energizing its core supporters with positions and messages that alienate large numbers of Republicans, let alone swing voters and Democrats. Trump’s call to put Clinton in jail if he wins is popular with the base but has drawn a sharp rebuke from across the political spectrum, including former top Republican government lawyers. Trump’s repeated praise and defense of Russia, even deflecting blame on the election hack at the last debate, prompted intelligence officials to disclose to the press that Trump and Clinton had been briefed on the findings that led to last week’s formal accusation of Russian involvement.

If those are odd positions, it’s baffling that four weeks from an election Trump has openly declared war on top Republican leaders. In a series of tweets on Tuesday, Trump said, that “the shackles have been taken off” him, and then went on to attack not Hillary Clinton and Democrats, but rather House Speaker Paul Ryan, Sen. John McCain, and Republicans in general for failing to be as loyal to their candidate as Democrats. It is already extremely bad for Republicans and with Trump’s fusillade Tuesday morning; it’s looking like its only going to get worse.

The dilemma for Republican elected officials like Ryan and McCain is that they are caught in a pincer set by the conflicting demands of this election and their political future. The reality is that many more Republican voters want Republican elected officials to stick with Trump than want them to dump him—a poll released by Politico showed 74% of Republicans want the party to stand by Trump to only 13% who don’t. So that means that Republicans on the ballot this year are in a lose-lose situation with Trump: back him and risk losing support from some Republicans and many more swing voters, or drop him and preserve a chance to win some swing voters but anger the base of your party. And regardless of how it plays out on November 8, sticking with Trump in this election could be a huge anchor around the necks of Republicans for many elections to come.

 

Find all related publications
Publications
15/07/2024

Climate progress in the EU and the world

FEPS Primer series - Stephen Minas
10/07/2024

Digital regulatory power but technology taker

How do we create an ecosystem for the European digital model
03/07/2024

Embracing Feminist Foreign Policy within EU strategic foresight capabilities

03/07/2024

Building Economic Democracy in Europe

Concepts, Cases and Achieving Progressive Change
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
15/07/2024

Less is more: time to re-purpose the European Political Community?

12/07/2024

After the general election, France in a political conundrum

12/07/2024

Le Pen’s delayed victory

Find all related news
News
04/07/2024

FEPS Delegation attends T20/C20 Midterm Conference in Brazil

27/06/2024

Join Tax the EU Billionaires Day!

25/06/2024

The EUROPAEUM delegation visits FEPS

20/06/2024

FEPS celebrates its annual General Assembly and welcomes new members

Find all related in the media
In the media

Eurozone Finance Ministers to talk belt tightening

by POLITICO 15/07/2024
FEPS Secretary General László Andor discusses the rise of supply-side progressivism following the success of the Labour Party in the UK Elections with POLITICO

NATO-bővítés sok vitával: érvek, ellenérvek és lobbik a Clinton-elnökség idején

by BBC History 07/07/2024
"The controversial NATO enlargement: pros, cons and lobbying during the Clinton presidency" This article, written by FEPS Secretary General László Andor, looks back to the 1990s when the Eastern enlargement of NATO was requested, discussed, orchestrated, and eventually completed.

Falsely historic European elections bring little change, says FEPS

by Agence Europe 18/06/2024
Agence Europe's article features an analysis of the EU election results by Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Director for Research and Training, published in The Progressive Post.

Die EU-Osterweiterung nach 20 Jahren: Kann die Konvergenz sozial und wirtschaftlich nachhaltig gestaltet werden?

by Wirtschaftsdienst 13/06/2024
'EU Eastward Enlargement After 20 Years: Socially and Economically Sustainable Convergence?' FEPS Secretary General László Andor co-authored this article of the German journal Wirtschaftsdienst