The Progressive Post

Denmark: cautious new taxes for a progressive turn

In the recent parliamentary elections, the Danes have voted for more welfare spending and action on climate change.

holds a Master of Science in Economics and works for the Economic Council of the Labour Movement (ECLM) since 2018. Before she was employed by the Danish Economic Councils.

In the recent parliamentary elections, the Danes have voted for more welfare spending and action on climate change. Now it is up the new prime Minister Mette Frederiksen to keep the promises of the campaign. But with the economy in good shape, taxing the rich in order to finance a new early retirement scheme, acting against climate and hiring people in the day care sector provide a unique chance for the progressive Denmark to promote social and green policies.

Just 10 days after voting in the European parliamentary elections, the Danes elected a new national parliament. The previous election campaign primarily focused on three topics: Acting on climate change, improving welfare services and immigration policy.

The economy as such, however, has not been a priority during the campaign. The consensus among the main parties was that the Danish economy is in good shape. And it is true that the economy is growing, and that employment figures keep reaching new record levels. Several labour supply reforms are already in place, which have raised the retirement and early retirement ages. This has future-proofed the public finances, but no more low-hanging fruits remain. 

The recent election is a unique chance for the progressive Denmark to promote social and green policies!

Economic issues were present in the discussions, but they focused to a great extent on whether the public purse can finance what is needed to uphold welfare services given the expected rise in the number of elderly and children in the coming years. Forecasts believe that it can be done without increased taxes. Thus, there is no burning need for reforms.

Broadly speaking, the right-wing parties want tax cuts and the left-wing parties want more welfare services after years of austerity. Both scenarios will put pressure on the public finances and call for either further cuts to the welfare spending or increased taxes. Altogether however, confidence in the Danish welfare state is high, and in every poll, people trust the SD to be better on welfare issues, which explains, to a certain extent, their election victory.

They do have a few tax increases on the agenda such as the inheritance tax, higher top bracket rate for capital income and new tax contributions from the financial sector, but these are all areas which are not intended to hit ordinary people, but rather the rich. The SD will need this money to finance a new early retirement scheme for people who have been in the labour force for many years and have been worn down by it. 

Mostly this election has been about spending money. Acting against climate change will require more spending. Either for research or as incentives – for instance to trade a petrol-car for an electric one. Furthermore, the left-wing wants to put a cap on how many children one kindergarten teacher should look after, which will require hiring thousands of professionals in the day care sector. 

In her new role as Prime Minister, SD leader Mette Frederiksen, has to square the circle with the left-wing parties wanting more welfare spending, which she doesn’t have the money for, and the far left and the centre-liberal party demanding a softer immigration policy, when the SD promised no changes in the broad immigration policy during the election. 

So, the course will not be easy for Frederiksen, but when it comes to setting a new direction for Denmark, we have seen no better chance in the last 20 years. The recent election is a unique chance for the progressive Denmark to promote social and green policies!

Find all related publications

Digital regulatory power but technology taker

How do we create an ecosystem for the European digital model

Embracing Feminist Foreign Policy within EU strategic foresight capabilities


Building Economic Democracy in Europe

Concepts, Cases and Achieving Progressive Change

Responsibility-sharing or shifting?

New Pact Implementation series
Find all related news

FEPS Delegation attends T20/C20 Midterm Conference in Brazil


Join Tax the EU Billionaires Day!


The EUROPAEUM delegation visits FEPS


FEPS celebrates its annual General Assembly and welcomes new members

Find all related in the media
In the media

NATO-bővítés sok vitával: érvek, ellenérvek és lobbik a Clinton-elnökség idején

by BBC History 07/07/2024
"The controversial NATO enlargement: pros, cons and lobbying during the Clinton presidency" This article, written by FEPS Secretary General László Andor, looks back to the 1990s when the Eastern enlargement of NATO was requested, discussed, orchestrated, and eventually completed.

Falsely historic European elections bring little change, says FEPS

by Agence Europe 18/06/2024
Agence Europe's article features an analysis of the EU election results by Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Director for Research and Training, published in The Progressive Post.

Die EU-Osterweiterung nach 20 Jahren: Kann die Konvergenz sozial und wirtschaftlich nachhaltig gestaltet werden?

by Wirtschaftsdienst 13/06/2024
'EU Eastward Enlargement After 20 Years: Socially and Economically Sustainable Convergence?' FEPS Secretary General László Andor co-authored this article of the German journal Wirtschaftsdienst

Flere har en computer som chef: »Det dræber al gejst og motivation«

by Finans 12/06/2024
'Several people have a computer as their boss: "It kills all spirit and motivation" Finans article features FEPS latest policy study and survey 'Computer in command'