Shifting plates and Europe’s future

A remarkable public consultation is under way which will determine the future of Europe for […]

FEPS Secretary General

A remarkable public consultation is under way which will determine the future of Europe for the coming years – if not decades. Citizens are discussing how green our future should be, and what to do to protect democracy inside and outside the European Union. Preserving economic competitiveness, but at the same time strengthening social cohesion, dealing with the care crisis in the wake of demographic ageing, improving the lot of poorer people by new minimum wage rules, or whether there is appetite for cross-country fiscal risk sharing are just a few examples of concerns and ideas appearing in the ongoing discussions.

This remarkable dialogue could be called ‘conference on the future of Europe’, but that title is occupied already. The one in which we are witnessing the millions of active citizens, and which will determine much more is called the German Bundestag elections. Already in the early months of the campaign marathon, this one has produced many thrilling twists and turns, but now it is on the final stretch and soon, we can have more certainty about the likely outcome.

There are of course various other parliamentary elections in the European calendar, but the German one has always a special effect on life in the EU bubble. Whatever dossiers are in the various legislative pipelines, they have to slow down and wait until the colours of the new coalition in Berlin are clarified. Brussels officials are impatient to read the EU chapter of the new coalition agreement, from which the future of Europe can be learned.

It is important not to forget some of the recent examples of this very direct impact circuit. For example, from 2009 to 2013, Germany was governed by a centre-right coalition which, unfortunately, had a strong effect on all different EU policies, starting with economics. When a grand coalition was formed after the 2013 elections, the change was clear. And if the current campaign leads to a government dominated by Social Democrats and Greens, which current opinion polls seem to indicate, the EU as a whole has to finally prepare to turn the ship into a new direction. Perhaps such a shift represents the choices of a young generation in Germany – but also elsewhere in Europe – that is keen to see effective government action for the protection of our climate and for improving the well-being of the majority in our societies.

Stretching our memory a little bit further back in time, we can recall when an SPD-Green coalition was in office for seven years. They left behind an emblematic labour market reform which for a decade remained as an inspiration for the rest of Europe, but today is considered to be a flawed prototype calling for further corrections. On the other hand, Germany under Gerhard Schröder and Joschka Fischer wanted to project its own identity and principles to the world. They showed solidarity with the American people when the US was attacked by Saudi terrorists in 2001, 20 years ago, but refused to be dragged into all different military enterprises the US launched after the destruction of the twin towers of Manhattan.

Remembering this is all the more important because today, in global politics, plates are shifting too, with massive implications for the orientation of EU policy, international roles, and the overall architecture in the long run. The trauma of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan will remain with us. But it will also hammer home a new understanding of the world system and recreate the external impetus for the European Union to reconsider its approach to global politics: questions of peace, security, and development. Perhaps a new German government will arrive at the best time to define an international agenda built around the concept of global sustainability.

Since January, when Joe Biden moved into the White House, some might have thought that all the thinking about strategic autonomy of Europe can be now shelved, since “America is back”. This slogan still holds, but not in the sense that the US would be willing to return to “business as usual”. Especially, the neoconservative business, the legacy of Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, or John Bolton is what needs to be phased out as fast as possible. The ill-conceived “war on terror” was launched by the George W. Bush administration by exploiting the grief of American people after the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington. The US, today, is bound to seek a new direction, domestically as well as internationally.

One can speculate whether it is just the 20 years of the neoconservative chapter in US foreign policy, which is closing now, or whether Biden is pulling the curtain on a much longer era. The New World Order proclaimed by George H.W. Bush? The bullish fights against evil empires à la Ronald Reagan? Or an even longer period of military internationalism to which the US escalated itself with the Vietnam war and never really managed to end?

Whichever periodisation is most relevant, we are witnessing shifting plates again. It is neither just the impertinence of Donald Trump, nor simply the miscalculation of the current administration which is behind the US (and NATO) military withdrawal and the reconsideration of American engagement in the Middle East and Central Asia. The staggering costs of wars in terms of money but even more in terms of human lives cannot be ignored any longer, and the new US leadership has no other option but to create a new balance between solving economic and social problems domestically and continuing a leading role and various missions internationally.

When an old chapter is closed, a new one is not necessarily open yet. It takes time for new directions and arrangements to emerge in global governance. The shock of Kabul is not forcing the European Union to jump into any improvised role in the international arena. On the other hand, the actual, even though less noticeable ‘Conference on the Future of Europe’ will have to pay much more attention to the potential roles and responsibilities of the EU in the world than the promoters of this initiative would have originally thought.

Photo credit: Mahir Kart/Shutterstock

Find all related publications

SDGs for all: Strategic scenarios

Earth4All system dynamics modelling of SDG progress

Lula’s new government

Prospects for Brazilian foreign policy and relations with the EU

The Sahel region: A litmus test for EU-Africa relations in a changing global order

'12 years of crises in the Sahel' series

Europe and the war in Ukraine

From Russian aggression to a new Eastern policy
Find all related events

Walking the talk

Feminist Foreign Policy in action
Geneva, Switzerland (Expert meeting)

For a New Global Deal

The current global order is under a larger-scale transformation: existential challenges emerging for all humankind, […]

The Sahel region

The EU and a changing global order
Find all related news

FEPS President at the SDG Summit and United Nations General Assembly in New York

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues is in New York this week on the occasion of […]

Call for tender – Research and analysis for the project “Progressive paths to rebuild Ukraine”

Basic Information Project Research “In search of a ‘lost generation’. Harnessing youth potential for post-war […]

President Lula da Silva meets with FEPS and Plataforma CIPÓ

The Brazilian President was present in Brussels in the context of the EU-CELAC Summit

Grzegorz Pietruczuk is FEPS Progressive Person of the Year

FEPS Progressive Person of the Year 2023
Find all related in the media
In the media

‘SDG funding gap swells to $137trn’ New Policy Study from FEPS, together with Earth4All, to deliver a five-point plan for the SDGs.

by Edie 19/09/2023
The “SDGs for All” report emphasises that policymakers have the potential to significantly advance SDG implementation by the original 2030 deadline and beyond by enacting five “extraordinary turnarounds” that break away from current trends.

Un nuevo informe de prospectiva identifica las medidas políticas urgentes necesarias para volver a encarrilar los ODS

by Cope 14/09/2023
'New foresight report identifies urgent policy measures needed to get the SDGs back on track' Cope's article on the policy study 'SDGs for all: Strategic scenarios', published in collaboration with Earth4All

Ukrainian economy and society: whither the (postwar) country?

by Commons 16/06/2023
In Commons' article, Yuliya Yurchenko, co-author of FEPS’ book 'Europe and the war in Ukraine', outlines the consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine for the Ukrainian population and the plans needed for Ukraine's recovery.

Rebuilding Ukraine will require radical economic change

by openDemocracy 16/06/2023
In OpenDemocracy's article, Yuliya Yurchenko, co-author of FEPS’ book 'Europe and the war in Ukraine', outlines the consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine for the Ukrainian population and the plans needed for Ukraine's recovery.