The Progressive Post

EU’s working conditions’ proposals good but more needs to be done

An interview by Alain Bloëdt with MEP Agnes Jongerius on the issue of workers’ conditions in the 21st century

Member of the European Parliament, Progressive Alliance of the Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament
10/07/2018

Interview

An interview by Alain Bloëdt, Editor-in-Chief of The Progressive Post with MEP Agnes Jongerius on the issue of workers’ conditions in the 21st century in the context of the Commission’s legislative proposals for more transparent and predictable working conditions.

The exponential growth of online platforms like Uber, Deliveroo and Amazon has created a new challenge for employment rights. And the Europe-level response to these challenges have been slow to develop and poorly designed.  After 27 years of the Written Statement Directive (WSD), a revision is long overdue. The Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions Directive will revise the WSD.

Positive elements in the Directive
Overall, I welcome the Commission’s proposals for a new Directive. It will provide important protection and new and clearer rights for vulnerable workers in atypical and precarious work.
First, from day one, new start- ers are guaranteed a document explicitly outlining the conditions of the working relationship. At the moment, employees can expect to wait two months before seeing such a document.

It will provide important protection and new and clearer rights for vulnerable workers in atypical and precarious work.

Second, the draft Directive seeks to incorporate a broad definition of ‘worker’, derived from EU case law, extending the scope of the new rules to more people. As they work currently, the rules are limited to a relatively narrow definition of ‘employer’.
The Directive will tackle unfair terms for new starters: employ- ers will not be able to charge for mandatory training sessions, put workers on excessive probationary period and, crucially, employers will not be able to demand exclusivity clauses in contracts without good reason.
Nevertheless, much remains to be done.

Zero hours contracts are a growing problem
I want to see a ban on zero hours contracts (ZHC) which signif- icantly weaken the rights of working people and adversely affect their work-life balance. According to the UK’s Office for National Statistics, there were 1.8 million zero hours contracts intheUKin2018anda pollof workers on zero-hour contracts commissioned by the UK’s Trades Union Congress (TUC) published in 2018 found that:
More than half (51%) of zero hour workers have had shifts cancelled at less than 24 hours’ notice.
Nearly three-quarters (73%) have been offered work at less than 24 hours’ notice.
And alarmingly, around a third of those on zero hour contracts (35 per cent) have been threatened with not being given shifts in the future if they turn down work.
Only 25% say they prefer being on zero hour contracts

I hope to see the European Parliament and the Council address these problems and strengthen the Directive so that trade union workplace representatives can better inform workers of their rights under this new Directive.

Directive needs to be strengthened
These workers rarely get sick, redundancy or holiday pay. Nearly half of them do not get written terms and conditions and hardly any get a permanent contract after consistently working the same pattern of hours. This is why there is scepticism that the proposed ‘right to request’ regular hours after a year on the job – as suggested by the Taylor Review and recommended by the Government – will change things for the better. Such a right to request would not fundamentally change the power dynamics where a vulnerable worker will remain at the mercy of the employer.
Furthermore, a written state- ment should be provided before any work has started. Apart from anything else, who wants to spend their first day in a job reading the terms of their employment while adapting to a new job at the same time?
I hope to see the European Parliament and the Council address these problems and strengthen the Directive so that trade union workplace representatives can better inform workers of their rights under this new Directive.

We must make sure that the rights in the Directive are not watered down and we must allow Member States to put in place more protection for workers that goes beyond the provisions of the Directive. The definitions in this Directive should extend its provisions to the greatest number of people. Your rights as a worker should not be different because your employer is a small company.
Working people cannot wait any longer for better con- ditions. The new proposals from the Commission are a step in the right direction but there is a lot of work left to do and not much time.

Find all related publications
Publications
15/07/2024

Climate progress in the EU and the world

FEPS Primer series - Stephen Minas
10/07/2024

Digital regulatory power but technology taker

How do we create an ecosystem for the European digital model
03/07/2024

Embracing Feminist Foreign Policy within EU strategic foresight capabilities

03/07/2024

Building Economic Democracy in Europe

Concepts, Cases and Achieving Progressive Change
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
15/07/2024

Less is more: time to re-purpose the European Political Community?

12/07/2024

After the general election, France in a political conundrum

12/07/2024

Le Pen’s delayed victory

Find all related news
News
04/07/2024

FEPS Delegation attends T20/C20 Midterm Conference in Brazil

27/06/2024

Join Tax the EU Billionaires Day!

25/06/2024

The EUROPAEUM delegation visits FEPS

20/06/2024

FEPS celebrates its annual General Assembly and welcomes new members

Find all related in the media
In the media

Eurozone Finance Ministers to talk belt tightening

by POLITICO 15/07/2024
FEPS Secretary General László Andor discusses the rise of supply-side progressivism following the success of the Labour Party in the UK Elections with POLITICO

NATO-bővítés sok vitával: érvek, ellenérvek és lobbik a Clinton-elnökség idején

by BBC History 07/07/2024
"The controversial NATO enlargement: pros, cons and lobbying during the Clinton presidency" This article, written by FEPS Secretary General László Andor, looks back to the 1990s when the Eastern enlargement of NATO was requested, discussed, orchestrated, and eventually completed.

Falsely historic European elections bring little change, says FEPS

by Agence Europe 18/06/2024
Agence Europe's article features an analysis of the EU election results by Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Director for Research and Training, published in The Progressive Post.

Die EU-Osterweiterung nach 20 Jahren: Kann die Konvergenz sozial und wirtschaftlich nachhaltig gestaltet werden?

by Wirtschaftsdienst 13/06/2024
'EU Eastward Enlargement After 20 Years: Socially and Economically Sustainable Convergence?' FEPS Secretary General László Andor co-authored this article of the German journal Wirtschaftsdienst