Public participation – an opportunity for the democratic development of Latvia and European Union

Organized on 20th July, 2012 in Riga,  in the Trade union house, by Foundation for European […]

21/07/2012

Organized on 20th July, 2012 in Riga,  in the Trade union house, by Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) and the Freedom and Solidarity Foundation (BSF), the Forum consisted of two parts – first performed by experts, followed by question/ answer session, while the second was intense discussion between the parliamentary parties representatives and the audience.

At the forum the first insight into the current situation and future prospects was given by the representative of PROVIDUS and political scientist Linda Jēkobsone. Head of the Association of Progressive Ansis Dobelis gave insight into the Latvian referendum history and how future of referendums could be affected by the planned changes in legislation. President of the Latvian Free Trade Union Pēteris Krīgers gave an insight into the work of trade unions using a variety of participatory tools, thus revealing the Latvian opportunities and obstacles. Harald Baumann-Hasske, Lawyer, President of EUSONET presented the new EU participatory tool – collection of signatures for the support of petitions. He stressed that the initiative is new, and the first results of the assessment can be the conclusion that it was necessary and could still be improved. Mārcis Rubenis, from the initiative portal Manabalss.lv, outlined the progress made so far and presented a new forms of participation on the Internet. On the contrast Karīna Voronova, Member of the Board of the Latvian Youth Council (LJP) reported on discussions that took place among the youth organizations about the opportunities granted to the right to vote from the age of 16.

The participants of the forum tried to find answers and look for a common denominator for the participatory tools for future development of the European Union and Latvia. Discussion took place on already adopted participatory tools and those who are under development and discussion stage. Very strenuous talk developed on subjects such as changes in the current referendum law, initiating and funding arrangements for referendums,  the opportunity to vote via internet and gains and losses from youth participation in elections from age 16 years.

Discussion on the possible referendum restriction, supported by the ruling parties, raised strongly voiced opposing views from the participants of the forum. Overall, it was concluded that the introduction of restrictions on referendum actually means to increase the influence of money on the political process in the country. In this case, neither Trade unions`, nor pensioners’ associations, nor the majority of other Latvian organizations active citizens can no longer afford to initiate referendums– this instrument will become oligarchs and foreign fund support group prerogatives. On this background, particularly hypocritical is the same change initiator election promises to promote popular participation in politics and to reduce the powers of individual oligarchs and the impact on the political process in Latvian.

Forum served as a good discussion platform for various public organizations and unions, giving the opportunity to hear the opinions of experts and to address in person the representatives of political parties. Forum life-stream was available on one of the largest Latvian Internet news sites www.tvnet.lv, that led to substantive discussions on various social media platforms. As a significant benefit to the forum was chosen timing, that coincided with a debate in the public space of the Latvian participation in the development of tools and especially referendum voting mechanism.

Video

Photos

Network
Freedom and Solidarity Foundation (Draft)
Find all related publications
Publications
28/11/2025

Smarter spending today, safer societies tomorrow

Digitally-enabled capabilities for European defence
28/11/2025

More money, more dependence?

Financing European Union defence for autonomy and cooperation
28/11/2025

ReArm Europe

The impact and role of EU arms export controls
18/11/2025

Public investment in the proposed 2028-2034 EU budget

Needs, gaps and options
Find all related news
News
04/12/2025

It is high time that the goal is set on “Quality”

FEPS commentary on the Quality Jobs Roadmap
27/11/2025

Is a bad COP outcome better than no outcome at all?

FEPS Commentary on COP30
27/11/2025

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues at the T20 South Africa Summit in Johannesburg

Organised by the South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA), the Institute for Global Dialogue […]
21/10/2025

Maria João Rodrigues at PES Congress 2025

🇳🇱 🌹 FEPS attended the Party of European Socialists (PES) Congress in Amsterdam, which included […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

« La souveraineté numérique européenne est un défi d’ordre civilisationnel »

by Le Monde 15/11/2025
"European digital sovereignty is a challenge for civilisation as a whole". In an opinion piece in the newspaper Le Monde, FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues shares her concerns about European digital dependence on American and Asian giants

When Algorithms Undermine Democracy: Europe’s Wake-Up Call

by Social Europe 11/11/2025
Maja Fjaestad and Simon Vinge, co-editors of FEPS book "Algorithmic rule", wrote this op-ed on the power of algorithms and how they threaten the foundations of democratic oversight

Los mapas de las fronteras internas que alimentan el voto ultra en Europa

by El Confidencial 13/10/2025
"The internal border maps that fuel the far-right vote in Europe" - FEPS Secretary-General László Andor discusses the impact of cohesion policies on social inequalities and the rise of the far-right across Europe in this El Confidencial article.

Migranti: Amato a FEPS — “Socialisti e populisti fomentano ossessione”

by Avanti! 29/09/2025
“Migrants: Amato to FEPS — ‘Socialists and populists fuel obsession’” News article in Avanti! where Hedwig Giusto, FEPS Head of International Affairs, critiques how both populist and some socialist political forces are stoking fear around migration. Giusto calls for balanced migration policies that respect human rights, reinforce solidarity among member states, and reject securitarian obsessions.