A YEAR AFTER: Transatlantic relations in a time of risk

It has been one year since perhaps the most consequential U.S. election in memory. Americans […]

02/02/2018

It has been one year since perhaps the most consequential U.S. election in memory. Americans as well as onlookers across the globe have witnessed a new style of U.S. foreign policy. Several traditional patterns of diplomacy and relationships of alliance have been overlooked, and policy is no longer communicated in speeches and press releases, but rather in 140 character tweets. The White House’s new type of foreign policy communication and messaging has left many questioning which direction of U.S. foreign policy. The United States faces a number of key challenges including a nuclear threat from North Korea, potential changes to the Iran nuclear deal, an increasingly influential China, and Russian aggression in Eastern Europe and beyond.

Many of the Trump administration’s responses to these challenges have been vague and unpredictable. And, with much of the president’s communication contradicting other administration announcements, the impact of his policies are called into question. How do we expect U.S. foreign policy to continue to evolve over the coming three years? Is this the end of traditional deliberate diplomacy? What impact will this new type of engagement have on foreign policy and U.S. influence across the globe? What does it mean for relations with Europe?

These questions along with a number of others formed the focus of an interesting discussion that was co-organised by the Foundation for European Progressive Studies and the German Marshall Fund of the United States on November 14th 2017 in Brussels. The event brought together Heather Conley, Senior Vice President for Europe, Eurasia, and the Arctic, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Kelly Magsamen, Vice President for National Security and International Policy, Center for American Progress and Nathalie Tocci, Director, Istituto Affari Internazionali, to offer their insights on what we have learnt almost a year after the election of Donald Trump as US president. The discussion was moderated by Ian Lesser, Vice President, The German Marshall Fund of the United States and was opened by Ernst Stetter, FEPS Secretary General.

Read the activity report

Network
Center for American Progress
German Marshall Fund
Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI)
Find all related publications
Publications
28/08/2026

How can Europe’s missing middle be financed

Translating Chinese lessons for scaling industrial innovation
14/08/2026

A just transition in the Mediterranean

Rebalancing the burdens and benefits of EU-North Africa energy cooperation
31/07/2026

Beyond the “Gaza Riviera” Approach

Preserving identity and supporting Palestine’s landscape and social fabric
22/07/2026

How (not) to fight the far right

FEPS YAN papers 9th cycle
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
25/09/2026

Equal rights, unequal choices: making gender equality real for Gen Z

What does gender equality mean if you can work full-time and still not afford to […]
25/09/2026

Gen Z’s political divide isn’t really about gender 

Progressives risk misreading Generation Z by treating social media, the manosphere and changing gender norms […]
21/09/2026

Can a fortress be attractive?

On the migration dimension of this year's State of the European Union speech
Find all related news
News
16/09/2026

FEPS Reacts: State of the European Union 2026

The 2026 State of the Union felt more like ‘von der Leyen I’ than ‘von […]
23/07/2026

FEPS Reacts: European Commission communication on the Action Plan on the European Pillar of Social Rights

By Laszlo Andor, FEPS Secretary-General & François Balate, Policy Analyst on Social The communication on the […]
08/07/2026

Letter to Manfred Weber, Chair of the EPP Group, by FEPS President Nicolas Schmit 

Dear Mr Weber, You are European, but also German. One should be entitled to expect […]
23/06/2026

FEPS Reacts: 10 years after Brexit

Written by FEPS Secretary-General László Andor 🔸 Brexit has been a case study in national self-harm. The […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

La Regina, il problema dei divari territoriali è una questione europea

by Regione Basilicata 22/09/2026
“La Regina: territorial disparities are a European issue” News article published by ANSA (IT), featuring Raffaele La Regina, participant in the FEPS Young Academics Network, discussing territorial and social inequalities across Europe, the need to reconcile competitiveness and cohesion, and the role of European cohesion policy, industrial policy and investment in ensuring that no region is left behind.

Канадскиот гамбит на Фон дер Лајен

by Racin.mk 21/09/2026
“Von der Leyen’s Canadian gambit” Opinion article by László Andor, FEPS Secretary General, published in Racin.mk (MK), analysing the EU’s growing rapprochement with Canada, the shift from geopolitics towards geoeconomics, and the need for Europe to reduce its dependence on the US while strengthening multilateralism. Andor also examines the Commission’s economic and social priorities, highlighting the need for stronger attention to living costs, labour and social policy.

Biztonságpolitika? Az a NATO dolga – EU-s biztosok értékelték Ursula von der Leyen beszédét

by Telex 21/09/2026
“Security policy? That’s NATO’s job – former EU Commissioners assess Ursula von der Leyen’s speech”. Article published in Telex (HU), featuring László Andor, FEPS Secretary General, analysing Ursula von der Leyen’s State of the Union address and discussing Europe’s economic competitiveness, investment gap, strategic vulnerabilities, AI, migration and the EU’s changing geopolitical position.

EU’s new cross‑border work rules favour recruitment, not workers, say critics

by EUObserver 16/09/2026
FEPS Policy Analyst on Social François Balate discusses the latest EU Labour Mobility Package under Commissioner Roxana Mînzatu zatu for the EUObserver.