Reforming the EU: From Reflection to Political Action >>> What is the Meseberg Agreement worth?

Speakers

13/09/2018
00:00 - 00:00
Rue Montoyer, 40. 1000 Brussels
Reforming the EU: From Reflection to Political Action >>> What is the Meseberg Agreement worth?
56263
467-the-franco-german-proposal-a-roadmap-for-europe
0

In order to give you access to our events, FEPS processes your personal data together with any other organiser of this event mentioned in the description of the event and in accordance with 'FEPS’ data protection policy.

On 13 September 2018, FEPS and the Jean Jaurès Foundation invite you to join a further reflection exercise on where politics should take us. With contributions by:

• Peter Bofinger
• Marco Buti
• Gesine Schwan
• Michael Vincent

The ‘reflection’ period fed by the White Paper on the Future of Europe, including many reflection and position papers offered by the European Commission, governments and experts alike might soon come to an end. Are we finally entering into a period of political action?

After elections in France and Germany, political talks on how to relaunch the European project and redress the EMU became more concrete. The proposals by the Commission from December 2017 urge member states to identify ways to deepen the economic and political cooperation in the Monetary Union.

With the Meseberg agreement, Chancellor Merkel and President Macron redefine the terms of political action on which the Franco-German engine of integration will operate. To which extent does the agreement show a preference for community over intergovernmental solutions? Is it sufficient to make progress on the Banking Union’s second pillar but not addressing the third? How to make the euro area stable if risk sharing is not seen as a method for risk reduction? Does it make sense to work together for tax convergence and leave the CCCTB out of the picture? Why limiting the EU action on migration to a security issue and an allocation scheme?

From 12:30-14:30

Lunch will be served from 12:00 pm

Check the programme 

Find all related publications
Publications
16/12/2024

Next Left country case studies

Exploring the state of Social Democracy in France, Austria, Romania, the Netherlands, Italy and Australia
13/12/2024

The great countdown

A guide on how to arrive prepared for the European elections 2029
12/12/2024

The Politics of Polycrisis

11/12/2024

From posts to polls

Understanding youth engagement in the 2024 European elections
Find all related news
News
03/12/2024

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues at the 2024 Understanding China Conference

03/12/2024

Joint statement by the Friends of the Western Balkans (FoWB) 

15/11/2024

Ahead of G20, FEPS president at the T20 and C20 Summit 2024

07/11/2024

US election results

Reaction by FEPS Secretary General
Find all related in the media
In the media

Study: EU needs a clear strategy for digital independence

by Europe.Table 09/12/2024
Read the coverage of our policy study 'Time to build a European digital ecosystem', in which experts call for the development of a European digital industrial policy.

Europe needs to have its own criteria to assess relationship with China

by Global Times 04/12/2024
Read this interview with FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues, as she delves into the intricate relationship between Europe and China, highlighting the opportunities a global partnership could create to improve global governance.

Record number of foreign attendees attend 2024 Understanding China Conference

by Global Times 03/12/2024
Read this Global Times article featuring an interview with FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues, where she emphasises the need to explore diverse pathways for the China-Europe relationship, moving beyond systemic rivalry

Migration in Europe: Planning for tomorrow’s crises

by Voxeurop 03/12/2024
This article explores a vital question: What direction will Europe's migration policy take in the future? It draws on insights from FEPS policy study, 'Meeting the challenges from the populist right', presenting alternative strategies to address migration crises without mirroring the far right’s divisive tactics.