More Europe versus No Europe. Institutional Reforms and Euroscepticism on the eve of the 2014 European elections

This is the leading theme of the conference that FEPS together with Italiani Europei and […]
Speakers

06 - 08/04/2014
00:00:00 - 00:00:00
Rome Rome, Italy
More Europe versus No Europe. Institutional Reforms and Euroscepticism on the eve of the 2014 European elections
55999
132-more-europe-versus-no-europe-institutional-reforms-and-euroscepticism-on-the-eve-of-the-2014-european-elections
0

In order to give you access to our events, FEPS processes your personal data together with any other organiser of this event mentioned in the description of the event and in accordance with 'FEPS’ data protection policy.

This is the leading theme of the conference that FEPS together with Italiani Europei and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Büro in Rome are holding together on Monday, 7th April 2014 in the capital of Italy. The event is expected to gather academics, representatives of civil society and politicians; and as such, it is already the second activity of the common cycle “Democratic Legitimacy and Political Leadership in the European Union”, which feeds in the deliberations on EU-democracy and europarties one of the pillars of the FEPS Next Left Research Programme.

With less than a hundred days remaining till the European citizens will go to the polling stations, there are many prognoses fueling the political debates. On one side, there is a strong feeling that the voters will demand a change of direction for Europe; on the other there is a fear that they will potentially turn to protest and populist forces. Hence there are many speculations regarding the possible result, as also potential for any eventual future coalition within the context of the European Parliaments and subsequently while completing the election for the President of the European Commission. This position carries now more than an institutional meaning. It is symbolic – not only in terms of mirroring an eventual shift in terms of political leadership, but also (depending on the negotiations’ outcome) offering a blueprint for a new balance between the intergovernmental and federal pillars of the EU.

The elections themselves will constitute the first chance for the citizens take the position on how to resume the European integration trajectory while still most evidently searching the ways out of the crisis. They are also the first ones during which, as hinted before, Lisbon Treaty will be used to a greater extent. There is therefore a hope that it will be an opportunity for the europarties to assume their new position, entering actively into the campaigns. With personalisation related already presented top candidates one hand, and more financial and structural support them on the other, the europarties may hope to assume more of political leadership in that context. The clearer cleavages in between pan-European visions can be a factor in politicising Europe and making the participation in them more meaningful to the voters. Empowered with their mandate, the europarties may stand a chance to enter into a new stage of development and in parallel transform the vote from the 2nd order election onto another level.

These are all the hopes, which stand a chance to be fulfilled – however the electoral map still looks truly complicated. The progressives, who identify themselves as a pro-European movement, face therefore a very difficult task. They need to convey a message of change, while at the same time not leaving a space for the anti-Europeanism that flourish currently on the wave of the criticism of the Union. They need to formulate a strong agenda, while not giving in the rhetoric of “TINA” (There is No Alternative). And then they also need to claim ownership of the policy issue, while enforcing a different style of policy making and politicizing the European political sphere herewith.

These themes frame the programme, which will feature two panels and a closing, political session. The two debating rounds will be based on papers drafted respectively by Dr. Eleonora Poli, Research Fellow at IAI and Dr. Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Senior Research Fellow. These two contributions will be opening the discussions, within which the first respondents are respectively two FEPS Next Left Working Group Members: Dr. André Krouwel, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Free University of Amsterdam and Dr. David Bailey, Lecturer at the Department of Political Science and International Studies
School of Government and Society of University of Birmingham.

For more information, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Senior Research Fellow at ania.skrzypek@feps-europe.eu or Ms. Ischi Graus, FEPS Events Organiser at ischi.graus@feps-europe.eu The material of the previous seminar you can find here: https://www.feps-europe.eu/en/news/369_democratic-legitimacy-and-political-leadership-in-the-european-union

Find all related publications
Publications
24/03/2025

Europe and the war in Ukraine

From Russian aggression to a new Eastern policy
06/03/2025

European defence for security and peace

Ensuring the security and well-being of its citizens is at the core of the European […]
28/02/2025

Political parties in the EU and the challenges of EU enlargement

Balkan Focus Series
28/02/2025

Moving towards an inclusive green agenda in the Western Balkans

Balkan Focus Series
Find all related news
News
13/03/2025

Europe’s defence strategy must be peace-oriented

FEPS Position Paper on European defence
10/03/2025

FEPS reaction to the Roadmap on Women’s Rights

On Friday 7 March, the European Commission presented its Roadmap for Women’s Rights ahead of […]
27/02/2025

European roundtable of Progressive think tanks

The European progressive way in the face of Trump's and the far-right agenda
26/02/2025

FEPS reaction to the European Commission’s Clean Industrial Deal

What Teresa Ribera presented today is an ambitious plan that makes the case for Europe […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

‘SPD defeat reveals need for new strategy for progressive forces’

by LabourList 24/02/2025
This article, published on the British news website LabourList, was written by FEPS Secretary General László Andor. It explores the results of the German elections and their implications for progressive forces.

Foundation for European Progressive Studies recommends introduction of minimum tax on capital income in EU

by Agence Europe 05/02/2025
In its 'Europe Daily Bulletin', the press agency Agence Europe features FEPS’ latest policy study, 'Tackling Tax Avoidance', which underscores the need for a minimum tax on capital income in the EU.

Nedostatak brižnosti

by Vox Feminae 04/02/2025
"Lack of care" The Croatian feminist magazine Vox Feminae highlights the chapter by Annica Kronsell in FEPS book "A new Gender Equality Contract for Europe", which is dedicated to imagining a new gender contract for the climate

Suomi on poikkeuksellisen herkkä menettämään verotuloja muiden maiden verohelpotusten takia

by Helsingin Sanomat 04/02/2025
Discussing the findings from the policy study "Tackling tax avoidance" with Kalevi Sorsa Foundation