More Europe versus No Europe. Institutional Reforms and Euroscepticism on the eve of the 2014 European elections

Speakers

06 - 08/04/2014
00:00:00 - 00:00:00
Rome Rome, Italy
More Europe versus No Europe. Institutional Reforms and Euroscepticism on the eve of the 2014 European elections
55999
132-more-europe-versus-no-europe-institutional-reforms-and-euroscepticism-on-the-eve-of-the-2014-european-elections
0

In order to give you access to our events, FEPS processes your personal data together with any other organiser of this event mentioned in the description of the event and in accordance with 'FEPS’ data protection policy.

This is the leading theme of the conference that FEPS together with Italiani Europei and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Büro in Rome are holding together on Monday, 7th April 2014 in the capital of Italy. The event is expected to gather academics, representatives of civil society and politicians; and as such, it is already the second activity of the common cycle “Democratic Legitimacy and Political Leadership in the European Union”, which feeds in the deliberations on EU-democracy and europarties one of the pillars of the FEPS Next Left Research Programme.

With less than a hundred days remaining till the European citizens will go to the polling stations, there are many prognoses fueling the political debates. On one side, there is a strong feeling that the voters will demand a change of direction for Europe; on the other there is a fear that they will potentially turn to protest and populist forces. Hence there are many speculations regarding the possible result, as also potential for any eventual future coalition within the context of the European Parliaments and subsequently while completing the election for the President of the European Commission. This position carries now more than an institutional meaning. It is symbolic – not only in terms of mirroring an eventual shift in terms of political leadership, but also (depending on the negotiations’ outcome) offering a blueprint for a new balance between the intergovernmental and federal pillars of the EU.

The elections themselves will constitute the first chance for the citizens take the position on how to resume the European integration trajectory while still most evidently searching the ways out of the crisis. They are also the first ones during which, as hinted before, Lisbon Treaty will be used to a greater extent. There is therefore a hope that it will be an opportunity for the europarties to assume their new position, entering actively into the campaigns. With personalisation related already presented top candidates one hand, and more financial and structural support them on the other, the europarties may hope to assume more of political leadership in that context. The clearer cleavages in between pan-European visions can be a factor in politicising Europe and making the participation in them more meaningful to the voters. Empowered with their mandate, the europarties may stand a chance to enter into a new stage of development and in parallel transform the vote from the 2nd order election onto another level.

These are all the hopes, which stand a chance to be fulfilled – however the electoral map still looks truly complicated. The progressives, who identify themselves as a pro-European movement, face therefore a very difficult task. They need to convey a message of change, while at the same time not leaving a space for the anti-Europeanism that flourish currently on the wave of the criticism of the Union. They need to formulate a strong agenda, while not giving in the rhetoric of “TINA” (There is No Alternative). And then they also need to claim ownership of the policy issue, while enforcing a different style of policy making and politicizing the European political sphere herewith.

These themes frame the programme, which will feature two panels and a closing, political session. The two debating rounds will be based on papers drafted respectively by Dr. Eleonora Poli, Research Fellow at IAI and Dr. Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Senior Research Fellow. These two contributions will be opening the discussions, within which the first respondents are respectively two FEPS Next Left Working Group Members: Dr. André Krouwel, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Free University of Amsterdam and Dr. David Bailey, Lecturer at the Department of Political Science and International Studies
School of Government and Society of University of Birmingham.

For more information, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Senior Research Fellow at ania.skrzypek@feps-europe.eu or Ms. Ischi Graus, FEPS Events Organiser at ischi.graus@feps-europe.eu The material of the previous seminar you can find here: https://www.feps-europe.eu/en/news/369_democratic-legitimacy-and-political-leadership-in-the-european-union

Find all related publications
Publications
06/12/2024

Feminist Foreign Policy Progressive Voices Collective

Policy recommendations
06/12/2024

A feminist foreign policy approach to EU security and defence

A contradiction in terms
05/12/2024

A unified industrial strategy for the EU

Industrial policy recommendations to promote decarbonisation, competitiveness and cohesion in Europe
04/12/2024

From talking to walking

Using feminist foreign policy to fund feminist organising
Find all related news
News
03/12/2024

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues at the 2024 Understanding China Conference

03/12/2024

Joint statement by the Friends of the Western Balkans (FoWB) 

15/11/2024

Ahead of G20, FEPS president at the T20 and C20 Summit 2024

07/11/2024

US election results

Reaction by FEPS Secretary General
Find all related in the media
In the media

Europe needs to have its own criteria to assess relationship with China

by Global Times 04/12/2024
Read this interview with FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues, as she delves into the intricate relationship between Europe and China, highlighting the opportunities a global partnership could create to improve global governance.

Record number of foreign attendees attend 2024 Understanding China Conference

by Global Times 03/12/2024
Read this Global Times article featuring an interview with FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues, where she emphasises the need to explore diverse pathways for the China-Europe relationship, moving beyond systemic rivalry

Migration in Europe: Planning for tomorrow’s crises

by Voxeurop 03/12/2024
This article explores a vital question: What direction will Europe's migration policy take in the future? It draws on insights from FEPS policy study, 'Meeting the challenges from the populist right', presenting alternative strategies to address migration crises without mirroring the far right’s divisive tactics.

Regolamentare l’Intelligenza artificiale è la prossima frontiera progressista

by Gil Stati Generali 17/11/2024
The study "Algorithmic Management in the workplace| is discussed in this article on the implications of algorithmic managemnet on workers