More Europe versus No Europe. Institutional Reforms and Euroscepticism on the eve of the 2014 European elections

This is the leading theme of the conference that FEPS together with Italiani Europei and […]
Speakers

06 - 08/04/2014
00:00:00 - 00:00:00
Rome Rome, Italy
More Europe versus No Europe. Institutional Reforms and Euroscepticism on the eve of the 2014 European elections
55999
132-more-europe-versus-no-europe-institutional-reforms-and-euroscepticism-on-the-eve-of-the-2014-european-elections
0

In order to give you access to our events, FEPS processes your personal data together with any other organiser of this event mentioned in the description of the event and in accordance with 'FEPS’ data protection policy.

This is the leading theme of the conference that FEPS together with Italiani Europei and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Büro in Rome are holding together on Monday, 7th April 2014 in the capital of Italy. The event is expected to gather academics, representatives of civil society and politicians; and as such, it is already the second activity of the common cycle “Democratic Legitimacy and Political Leadership in the European Union”, which feeds in the deliberations on EU-democracy and europarties one of the pillars of the FEPS Next Left Research Programme.

With less than a hundred days remaining till the European citizens will go to the polling stations, there are many prognoses fueling the political debates. On one side, there is a strong feeling that the voters will demand a change of direction for Europe; on the other there is a fear that they will potentially turn to protest and populist forces. Hence there are many speculations regarding the possible result, as also potential for any eventual future coalition within the context of the European Parliaments and subsequently while completing the election for the President of the European Commission. This position carries now more than an institutional meaning. It is symbolic – not only in terms of mirroring an eventual shift in terms of political leadership, but also (depending on the negotiations’ outcome) offering a blueprint for a new balance between the intergovernmental and federal pillars of the EU.

The elections themselves will constitute the first chance for the citizens take the position on how to resume the European integration trajectory while still most evidently searching the ways out of the crisis. They are also the first ones during which, as hinted before, Lisbon Treaty will be used to a greater extent. There is therefore a hope that it will be an opportunity for the europarties to assume their new position, entering actively into the campaigns. With personalisation related already presented top candidates one hand, and more financial and structural support them on the other, the europarties may hope to assume more of political leadership in that context. The clearer cleavages in between pan-European visions can be a factor in politicising Europe and making the participation in them more meaningful to the voters. Empowered with their mandate, the europarties may stand a chance to enter into a new stage of development and in parallel transform the vote from the 2nd order election onto another level.

These are all the hopes, which stand a chance to be fulfilled – however the electoral map still looks truly complicated. The progressives, who identify themselves as a pro-European movement, face therefore a very difficult task. They need to convey a message of change, while at the same time not leaving a space for the anti-Europeanism that flourish currently on the wave of the criticism of the Union. They need to formulate a strong agenda, while not giving in the rhetoric of “TINA” (There is No Alternative). And then they also need to claim ownership of the policy issue, while enforcing a different style of policy making and politicizing the European political sphere herewith.

These themes frame the programme, which will feature two panels and a closing, political session. The two debating rounds will be based on papers drafted respectively by Dr. Eleonora Poli, Research Fellow at IAI and Dr. Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Senior Research Fellow. These two contributions will be opening the discussions, within which the first respondents are respectively two FEPS Next Left Working Group Members: Dr. André Krouwel, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Free University of Amsterdam and Dr. David Bailey, Lecturer at the Department of Political Science and International Studies
School of Government and Society of University of Birmingham.

For more information, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Senior Research Fellow at ania.skrzypek@feps-europe.eu or Ms. Ischi Graus, FEPS Events Organiser at ischi.graus@feps-europe.eu The material of the previous seminar you can find here: https://www.feps-europe.eu/en/news/369_democratic-legitimacy-and-political-leadership-in-the-european-union

Find all related publications
Publications
17/04/2026

The open future and its enemies

How we can protect free society from AI dictatorship
17/04/2026

EqualiZe

A new political gender divide is often said to be defining Gen Z in Europe: […]
27/03/2026

Laboratories of counter-hegemony

Orbán, Trump and the transatlantic far-right ecosystem
25/03/2026

The European Green Deal tracker

How well is your member state implementing key policies of the Green Deal? The European […]
Find all related Audiovisual
Audiovisual
24/04/2026

The language of EUROPEAN SOVEREIGNTY with Josep Borrell

📺🔊 Available on YouTube, Spotify & Apple Podcast In this episode of FEPS Talks, Josep […]
24/04/2026

The language of EUROPEAN SOVEREIGNTY with Josep Borrell

📺🔊 Available on YouTube, Spotify & Apple Podcast In this episode of FEPS Talks, Josep […]
23/04/2026

‘Accelerating industrial decarbonisation’ Flickr album

Discussions on technological neutrality and on the IAA
23/04/2026

‘An enlargement for a new generation ’ better natures; is it feasible?’ Flickr album

Photo album of the ‘An enlargement for a new generation‘ event in Brussels, Belgium. The […]
Find all related news
News
13/04/2026

Hungary’s civic revolution

FEPS' commentary on the outcomes of the Hungarian election
05/03/2026

FFPPVC commentary on the new EU Gender Equality Strategy 2026-2030

Commentary by the Feminist Foreign Policy Progressive Voices Collective (FFPPVC)
03/03/2026

Wag the dog?

FEPS commentary on the US-Israel attack on Iran
03/03/2026

Closing ceremony of the Progressive Ukraine programme

The graduation ceremony completed the programme which was part of the Open Progressive University (OPU).
Find all related in the media
In the media

The EU’s social blind spot in West Balkans enlargement

by EU Observer 27/04/2026
Read the article published in EU Observer, which mentions the conference "An enlargement for a new generation" organised by FEPS and its partners.

Orban loses despite Trump backing

by The Point 21/04/2026
FEPS SecGen Dr Laszlo Andor discusses with Dr Swasti Rao onto The Worldview to break down a dramatic political turning point. following the Hungarian election.

Orban loses despite Trump backing: Hungary enters a new era with a landslide win for Peter Magyar

by The Print India 16/04/2026
Watch FEPS SecGen László Andor's interview on the election in Hungary and the defeat of Viktor Orbán, despite visible support from JD Vance. What drove this shift? Why did international backing from US and Russia fail to move the needle? And what does this result signal for Hungary’s future and the broader European political landscape?

What next for Olivér Várhelyi, Orbán’s last man standing in Brussels?

by EURACTIV 14/04/2026
FEPS Secretary General László Andor discusses the potential impact of the HUngarian election result on EU Commissioner, Olivér Várhely