Could Social Democrats learn from the Resilience of Neo-Liberalism?

Presentation of the book: Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy by Vivien A. Schmidt, Mark […]
Speakers

22 - 24/06/2014
00:00:00 - 00:00:00
FEPS Office, Brussels FEPS Office, Brussels
Could Social Democrats learn from the Resilience of Neo-Liberalism?
56015
148-could-social-democrats-learn-from-the-resilience-of-neo-liberalism
0

In order to give you access to our events, FEPS processes your personal data together with any other organiser of this event mentioned in the description of the event and in accordance with 'FEPS’ data protection policy.

Presentation of the book: Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy by Vivien A. Schmidt, Mark Thatcher. With the participation of Amandine Crespy, Assistant-Professor for Political Science/EU Studies – Institut d’Etudes Européennes – CEVIPOL in the debate moderated by Bruno Liebhaberg.

The books explains that the neoliberal options, in spite of being the main cause of the financial crisis; continue attracting voters, as it was shown in the last European Elections. The authors explain this phenomenon with the provocative and stimulating account of how neo-liberalism has ensured its own resilience. The question in this discussion is how can social democracy itself return to resilience, learning lessons from neo-liberalism’s trajectory.     

Register now

Reception from 12 to 12:30. Debate from 12:30 to 14:00. 

Book review by Christophe Sente

This book, edited by Vivien Schmidt and Mark Thatcher, does not delve into the populist phenomenon or the European elections of May 2014. However, it does provide vital insight to help us understand such issues. This, at a time when ballot-box results have shown that even if neo-liberal ideas were responsible for the 2008 financial crisis and today’s economic stagnation in Europe, they have yet to lose their appeal. As a result, just like the traditional parties, the representatives of the new right who criticise the choices of the Commission by demanding a reassessment of the role of the State have not entirely turned their backs on the doctrines of Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, which have inspired governments since the 1980s. In this respect, the writings of Vivien Schmidt, Andrew Gamble and Maurizio Ferrera are useful in that they show how criticism of deficit spending and the welfare state has not led to any sort of consensus among the neo-liberal authors with regard to libertarian or anarcho-capitalist views. In fact, state control appears far less an exclusive trait of the left than the principle of socio-economic redistribution handled by a political authority.

Although they share the same line of questioning as Colin Crouch, who, in 2011, highlighted “the strange non-death of neo-liberalism,”[1] Vivien Schmidt and Mark Thatcher have avoided an overly economic approach. Their work represents a new milestone in the bid to clarify the characteristics, contradictions and paradoxes of European politics, following on from earlier books by Vivien Schmidt.

Included as an epigraph to the first chapter, Keynes’ comment that “the power of vested interests is vastly exaggerated compared with the gradual encroachment of ideas” illustrates a methodological approach that seeks to analyse the interaction between institutional developments and political ideas. In this context, the use of the word resilience—which, in psychology, denotes an individual’s capacity to adapt to stress and adversity by rising above the situation—is not a simple metaphor. Aside from the originality of using the term in the field of political science, it reflects an approach closer to the Hegelian tradition, which makes “sublation” (Aufhebung)—rather than antithesis—the focal point of dialectical reasoning.

The explanation provided by Vivien Schmidt, Mark Thatcher et al. with regard to resilience is stimulating and provocative. Stimulating because it encourages the reader not to succumb to the easy option of labelling neo-liberalism as pensée unique: the authors remind us that the notion that the free market is superior to market regulation by the authorities is rooted in a range of arguments from a number of different schools of thought. Their explanation is provocative because it suggests that the popularity of neo-liberalism lies notably in the limits of its effective application in Europe. When the time comes, will social democracy prove resilient enough to spare Europe the full impact of Hayek’s thinking? The book does not say. That particular responsibility falls to its readers.

 

Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy// Vivien A. Schmidt, Mark Thatcher (Cambridge University press, 2013)

 

ABOUT

Christophe Sente holds a PhD in Political Science from the Université Libre de Bruxelles, and is a member of the Gauche Réformiste Européenne think tank and the FEPS Scientific Council.

 

[1] C. Crouch, The strange non-death of neo-liberalism, Polity press, 2011

  

Find all related publications
Publications
04/02/2025

Tackling tax avoidance

Reforming Capital Income Taxation in the EU
29/01/2025

Progressive Yearbook 2025

2024 was announced as a ‘super election’ year. In fact, about half of the world’s […]
27/01/2025

Forging the new EU agenda

Progressive inputs for European economic policy
16/12/2024

Next Left country case studies

Exploring the state of Social Democracy in France, Austria, Romania, the Netherlands, Italy and Australia
Find all related news
News
07/02/2025

FEPS President on the European car industry and the Competitive Compass on Euronews ‘Brussels, my love?’

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues took part in the Euronews talk show ‘Brussels, my love?‘ […]
29/01/2025

Lithuanian Prime Minister Gintautas Paluckas awarded FEPS ‘Progressive Person of the Year’

FEPS Progressive Person of the Year 2024-2025
15/01/2025

Launch of the new Open Progressive University’s Ukraine programme!

We have launched the new programme ‘Progressive Ukraine’ in collaboration with S&D Group as part […]
03/12/2024

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues at the 2024 Understanding China Conference

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues participated in the 2024 Understanding China Conference, “Carry through the […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

Foundation for European Progressive Studies recommends introduction of minimum tax on capital income in EU

07/02/2025
In its 'Europe Daily Bulletin', the press agency Agence Europe features FEPS’ latest policy study, 'Tackling Tax Avoidance', which underscores the need for a minimum tax on capital income in the EU.

Nedostatak brižnosti

by Vox Feminae 04/02/2025
"Lack of care" The Croatian feminist magazine Vox Feminae highlights the chapter by Annica Kronsell in FEPS book "A new Gender Equality Contract for Europe", which is dedicated to imagining a new gender contract for the climate

Suomi on poikkeuksellisen herkkä menettämään verotuloja muiden maiden verohelpotusten takia

by Helsingin Sanomat 04/02/2025
Discussing the findings from the policy study "Tackling tax avoidance" with Kalevi Sorsa Foundation

Brussels promises to make red tape disappear – Brussels my love

by Euronews 03/02/2025
FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues participated in this episode of Euronews’ show ‘Brussels my love’ on EU car industry, the cost of living, inflation, and public transport.