Could Social Democrats learn from the Resilience of Neo-Liberalism?

Presentation of the book: Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy by Vivien A. Schmidt, Mark […]
Speakers

22 - 24/06/2014
00:00:00 - 00:00:00
FEPS Office, Brussels FEPS Office, Brussels
Could Social Democrats learn from the Resilience of Neo-Liberalism?
56015
148-could-social-democrats-learn-from-the-resilience-of-neo-liberalism
0

In order to give you access to our events, FEPS processes your personal data together with any other organiser of this event mentioned in the description of the event and in accordance with 'FEPS’ data protection policy.

Presentation of the book: Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy by Vivien A. Schmidt, Mark Thatcher. With the participation of Amandine Crespy, Assistant-Professor for Political Science/EU Studies – Institut d’Etudes Européennes – CEVIPOL in the debate moderated by Bruno Liebhaberg.

The books explains that the neoliberal options, in spite of being the main cause of the financial crisis; continue attracting voters, as it was shown in the last European Elections. The authors explain this phenomenon with the provocative and stimulating account of how neo-liberalism has ensured its own resilience. The question in this discussion is how can social democracy itself return to resilience, learning lessons from neo-liberalism’s trajectory.     

Register now

Reception from 12 to 12:30. Debate from 12:30 to 14:00. 

Book review by Christophe Sente

This book, edited by Vivien Schmidt and Mark Thatcher, does not delve into the populist phenomenon or the European elections of May 2014. However, it does provide vital insight to help us understand such issues. This, at a time when ballot-box results have shown that even if neo-liberal ideas were responsible for the 2008 financial crisis and today’s economic stagnation in Europe, they have yet to lose their appeal. As a result, just like the traditional parties, the representatives of the new right who criticise the choices of the Commission by demanding a reassessment of the role of the State have not entirely turned their backs on the doctrines of Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, which have inspired governments since the 1980s. In this respect, the writings of Vivien Schmidt, Andrew Gamble and Maurizio Ferrera are useful in that they show how criticism of deficit spending and the welfare state has not led to any sort of consensus among the neo-liberal authors with regard to libertarian or anarcho-capitalist views. In fact, state control appears far less an exclusive trait of the left than the principle of socio-economic redistribution handled by a political authority.

Although they share the same line of questioning as Colin Crouch, who, in 2011, highlighted “the strange non-death of neo-liberalism,”[1] Vivien Schmidt and Mark Thatcher have avoided an overly economic approach. Their work represents a new milestone in the bid to clarify the characteristics, contradictions and paradoxes of European politics, following on from earlier books by Vivien Schmidt.

Included as an epigraph to the first chapter, Keynes’ comment that “the power of vested interests is vastly exaggerated compared with the gradual encroachment of ideas” illustrates a methodological approach that seeks to analyse the interaction between institutional developments and political ideas. In this context, the use of the word resilience—which, in psychology, denotes an individual’s capacity to adapt to stress and adversity by rising above the situation—is not a simple metaphor. Aside from the originality of using the term in the field of political science, it reflects an approach closer to the Hegelian tradition, which makes “sublation” (Aufhebung)—rather than antithesis—the focal point of dialectical reasoning.

The explanation provided by Vivien Schmidt, Mark Thatcher et al. with regard to resilience is stimulating and provocative. Stimulating because it encourages the reader not to succumb to the easy option of labelling neo-liberalism as pensée unique: the authors remind us that the notion that the free market is superior to market regulation by the authorities is rooted in a range of arguments from a number of different schools of thought. Their explanation is provocative because it suggests that the popularity of neo-liberalism lies notably in the limits of its effective application in Europe. When the time comes, will social democracy prove resilient enough to spare Europe the full impact of Hayek’s thinking? The book does not say. That particular responsibility falls to its readers.

 

Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy// Vivien A. Schmidt, Mark Thatcher (Cambridge University press, 2013)

 

ABOUT

Christophe Sente holds a PhD in Political Science from the Université Libre de Bruxelles, and is a member of the Gauche Réformiste Européenne think tank and the FEPS Scientific Council.

 

[1] C. Crouch, The strange non-death of neo-liberalism, Polity press, 2011

  

Find all related publications
Publications
05/05/2025

Shaping a European budget fit for climate action and a just transition

The negotiations for the next EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) – the long-term budget at […]
28/04/2025

Housing as investment in Greece and Southern Europe

Private profit vs social value
22/04/2025

Trade, trust, and transition: Shaping the next transatlantic chapter

Essays series by FEPS and Center for American Progress (CAP)
08/04/2025

The profit-price spiral in food and energy

Analysis and toolbox to fight inflation
Find all related news
News
25/04/2025

Call for tender – Editorial services for FEPS recurrent flagship publications

This call for tender was launched on Friday 25 April and will close on Friday […]
13/03/2025

Europe’s defence strategy must be peace-oriented

FEPS Position Paper on European defence
10/03/2025

FEPS reaction to the Roadmap on Women’s Rights

On Friday 7 March, the European Commission presented its Roadmap for Women’s Rights ahead of […]
27/02/2025

European roundtable of Progressive think tanks

The European progressive way in the face of Trump's and the far-right agenda
Find all related in the media
In the media

Nem jó, hogy Magyarországon a szélsőjobb és a jobboldal versenyez

by Hírklikk 12/05/2025
“It's not good that the far-right and the right are competing in Hungary” Interview with FEPS Secretary General László Andor on KlikkTV (HU), featured in Hírklikk, discussing the rise of the far right in Hungary and the need for stronger progressive alternatives.

Rozdíly mnohým vyhovovaly

by A2 05/05/2025
"The differences suited many" In this article, László Andor, FEPS Secretary General, discusses the different challenges the European Union is currently facing.

Tévedés azt hinni, hogy Trump után visszatérhetünk a régi kerékvágásba

by telex 24/04/2025
“It’s a mistake to think we can go back to the old normal after Trump”. Interview with FEPS Secretary General László Andor in Telex (HU), where he discusses the global trade tensions triggered by Trump-era tariffs, the shifting US-China dynamic, and the need for the EU to develop a new strategic approach in a permanently changed world order.

Orbán’s stance on Ukraine pushes Hungary to brink in EU relations

by The Guardian 22/04/2025
News article by The Guardian (UK) quoting FEPS Secretary General László Andor, who highlights how Hungary’s obstructive stance on Ukraine is undermining vital EU unity and fuelling tensions among member states.