Seminar on Socialists and Europe

This is a closed seminar Contemporary Europe appears to many as a self-absorbed confederation of […]
Speakers

29 - 31/01/2015
09:30 - 17:00
Paris, France
FONDATION JEAN JAURÈS. 12, cité Malesherbes 75009 Paris FONDATION JEAN JAURÈS. 12, cité Malesherbes 75009 Paris
Seminar on Socialists and Europe
56052
185-feps-fes-fjj-seminar-on-socialists-and-europe
0

In order to give you access to our events, FEPS processes your personal data together with any other organiser of this event mentioned in the description of the event and in accordance with 'FEPS’ data protection policy.

This is a closed seminar

Contemporary Europe appears to many as a self-absorbed confederation of national states – within which sum of their particular interest creates a minimalistic agenda. It is the intergovernmental method that dominates within the decision making process, paving the way to fulfilment of more conservative-flavoured ideal of the Europe of Nations.

This project remains quite the opposite to the socialist federalist dream of Social Europe. The paradox of the situation is that there seem to be no turning away from this path, even though socialists returned to governments in over 20 states in the EU and assumed responsibility for leading over 10 of them. Hence so far the hopes that the recent crisis would become an indispensable incentive for change remain unfulfilled, disappointing all those, who believe that the traditional developmental pattern of the Union is a curve of consequent predicaments.

To that end, there is also a query on the actual outcome of the recent European elections. The Lisbon Treaty became a catalyst of new developments, among them the pan-European campaigns organised by the respective europarties under the leadership of the respective top candidates. Even though it was a major step forward, the results of the vote show only stagnation as far as the turnout and also confirm the tendency of decline of so called traditional parties.

Consequently, even though the ‘grand coalition’ regarding the leadership of the European Parliament has been sustained, its’ majority is a very thin one – resulting from further fragmentation and increased representation of the anti-European and Euro-skeptic forces within the chamber. It creates a worry that it will be more than challenging to gather a majority to pass any profound reform proposal.

Furthermore, although it is indisputable that it enabled further politicisation and personalisation of European politics, it is not certain that it translated to the full extent also into the recent process of nomination of the candidates for key EU posts (with exception here of the Presidents of the European Parliament and European Commission). In the course of this process the focus predominantly remains on converging national and personal interests, and there has been very little debate publicly on finding compromises among different political platforms – as presented by the europarties ahead of the European elections.

Within this logic, also the ambition spelled out in June that there should be a clear agenda for the next 5 years presented by the President of the European Council. True, that there have been pertinent issues – such as conflict in Ukraine to look at urgently – but it does not change the fact that it is hard to describe what the EU project is supposed to be about nowadays.

Without clearly set ambition, it would seem impossible to keep up the promise made by all the europarties in their manifestos that they would devote themselves in the years 20014 – 2019 to building strong Europe, which regains the trust of the young generation

Network
Fondation Jean-Jaurès
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
Find all related publications
Publications
22/04/2025

Trade, trust, and transition: Shaping the next transatlantic chapter

Essays series by FEPS and Center for American Progress (CAP)
08/04/2025

The profit-price spiral in food and energy

Analysis and toolbox to fight inflation
24/03/2025

Europe and the war in Ukraine

From Russian aggression to a new Eastern policy
06/03/2025

European defence for security and peace

Ensuring the security and well-being of its citizens is at the core of the European […]
Find all related news
News
13/03/2025

Europe’s defence strategy must be peace-oriented

FEPS Position Paper on European defence
10/03/2025

FEPS reaction to the Roadmap on Women’s Rights

On Friday 7 March, the European Commission presented its Roadmap for Women’s Rights ahead of […]
27/02/2025

European roundtable of Progressive think tanks

The European progressive way in the face of Trump's and the far-right agenda
26/02/2025

FEPS reaction to the European Commission’s Clean Industrial Deal

What Teresa Ribera presented today is an ambitious plan that makes the case for Europe […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

Tévedés azt hinni, hogy Trump után visszatérhetünk a régi kerékvágásba

by telex 24/04/2025
“It’s a mistake to think we can go back to the old normal after Trump”. Interview with FEPS Secretary General László Andor in Telex (HU), where he discusses the global trade tensions triggered by Trump-era tariffs, the shifting US-China dynamic, and the need for the EU to develop a new strategic approach in a permanently changed world order.

Orbán’s stance on Ukraine pushes Hungary to brink in EU relations

by The Guardian 22/04/2025
News article by The Guardian (UK) quoting FEPS Secretary General László Andor, who highlights how Hungary’s obstructive stance on Ukraine is undermining vital EU unity and fuelling tensions among member states.

Andor László: Fenntarthatóság vagy hadigazdaság Európában?

by Népszava 22/04/2025
“László Andor: Sustainability or war economy in Europe” Opinion article by FEPS Secretary General László Andor, published in Népszava (HU), discussing the EU’s need to balance its security response with addressing pressing social issues such as the housing crisis affecting most member states.

Kit de sobrevivência gera polémica na Europa

by Euronews PT 06/04/2025
On Euronews' "Bruxelas, meu amor?", FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues discusses the Preparedness Strategy, tariffs from the USA, and cost of travel to Strasbourg.