FEPS answer to Commissioner McCreevy’s consultation on hedge funds

When the G-20 is calling to “ensure that all financial market products and participants are […]


When the G-20 is calling to “ensure that all financial market products and participants are regulated or subject to oversight, as appropriate to their circumstances”, one has to wonder why such regulation would be needed. Without doubt, financial stability is essential for a smooth growth in wealth creation. Financial markets are a tool, and not an end in themselves, “supposed to perform certain vital functions which enable the real economy to be more productive”

However, when calling for more transparency, accountability, simplicity and disclosure, as often suggested, one has to wonder in what sense such information can be a source of financial stability. In fact, economic theory is divided on this point. Regulation can have a double meaning referring to different visions of the economic system. Therefore the question of regulation has to be analysed with regard to the economic debates which have been running for nearly 300 years now. Actually the question underlying the different types of regulation can be summarised in the following way: “Are variations in the relative price system the only source of information necessary in order to achieve financial stability?”

From the answer to this question one will be able to differentiate the different kinds of regulation principles needed and the institutions in charge of such an oversight. It will be possible to notice that some regulatory principles proposed could damage the European integration process whereas it seems that the present financial turmoil would call for a more integrated, global European regulation.

Read the contribution elaborated in the frame of FEPS expert group on hedge funds

Find all related publications

Back to the Dark Ages?

Q-commerce, rapid retail and the changing landscape of retail work

Getting the goods

Trade unions and strategy in the quick-commerce sector

Making Next-Generation EU a permanent tool

Recovery Watch series

Is an EU-wide approach to the mental health crisis necessary?

Demand for an EU mental health strategy existed before the pandemic but has intensified since. […]
Find all related news

Digital programme: Algorithms at the workplace

FEPS, together with Nordic partners, launched a Digital Program on algorithmic management and workers' rights

When will European women start earning the same as men?

Spoiler alert: that day hasn’t arrived yet

Let’s end involuntary unemployment!

European survey on the perception of unemployment and publicly funded jobs

New study on how and why social issues have increased in prominence during the EP negotiations

Progress towards inclusive economic transition but need for further improvements in terminology and framing of vulnerable groups
Find all related in the media
In the media

Research shows Ireland is too reliant on voluntary sector for mental health services

by RTÉ Radio 1 27/03/2023
RTÉ Radio 1 talks about our case studies 'Is an EU-wide approach to the mental health crisis necessary?', published in collaboration with Think-tank for Action on Social Change (TASC)

Irish mental health services ‘too hospital-centric’

by Irish Examiner 23/03/2023
Irish Examiner article on FEPS and TASC policy study "Is an EU-wide approach to the Mental Health Crisis necessary?"

Ireland lacks key mental health services, report finds

by RTÉ 23/03/2023
RTÉ article on FEPS and TASC policy study "Is an EU-wide approach to the Mental Health Crisis necessary?"

‘No one is unemployable’: the French social experiment

by EUobserver 21/03/2023
EUobserver article on unemployment in the EU with a mention to FEPS' policy brief 'A Job Guarantee for Europe.'