Public participation – an opportunity for the democratic development of Latvia and European Union

Organized on 20th July, 2012 in Riga,  in the Trade union house, by Foundation for European […]

21/07/2012

Organized on 20th July, 2012 in Riga,  in the Trade union house, by Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) and the Freedom and Solidarity Foundation (BSF), the Forum consisted of two parts – first performed by experts, followed by question/ answer session, while the second was intense discussion between the parliamentary parties representatives and the audience.

At the forum the first insight into the current situation and future prospects was given by the representative of PROVIDUS and political scientist Linda Jēkobsone. Head of the Association of Progressive Ansis Dobelis gave insight into the Latvian referendum history and how future of referendums could be affected by the planned changes in legislation. President of the Latvian Free Trade Union Pēteris Krīgers gave an insight into the work of trade unions using a variety of participatory tools, thus revealing the Latvian opportunities and obstacles. Harald Baumann-Hasske, Lawyer, President of EUSONET presented the new EU participatory tool – collection of signatures for the support of petitions. He stressed that the initiative is new, and the first results of the assessment can be the conclusion that it was necessary and could still be improved. Mārcis Rubenis, from the initiative portal Manabalss.lv, outlined the progress made so far and presented a new forms of participation on the Internet. On the contrast Karīna Voronova, Member of the Board of the Latvian Youth Council (LJP) reported on discussions that took place among the youth organizations about the opportunities granted to the right to vote from the age of 16.

The participants of the forum tried to find answers and look for a common denominator for the participatory tools for future development of the European Union and Latvia. Discussion took place on already adopted participatory tools and those who are under development and discussion stage. Very strenuous talk developed on subjects such as changes in the current referendum law, initiating and funding arrangements for referendums,  the opportunity to vote via internet and gains and losses from youth participation in elections from age 16 years.

Discussion on the possible referendum restriction, supported by the ruling parties, raised strongly voiced opposing views from the participants of the forum. Overall, it was concluded that the introduction of restrictions on referendum actually means to increase the influence of money on the political process in the country. In this case, neither Trade unions`, nor pensioners’ associations, nor the majority of other Latvian organizations active citizens can no longer afford to initiate referendums– this instrument will become oligarchs and foreign fund support group prerogatives. On this background, particularly hypocritical is the same change initiator election promises to promote popular participation in politics and to reduce the powers of individual oligarchs and the impact on the political process in Latvian.

Forum served as a good discussion platform for various public organizations and unions, giving the opportunity to hear the opinions of experts and to address in person the representatives of political parties. Forum life-stream was available on one of the largest Latvian Internet news sites www.tvnet.lv, that led to substantive discussions on various social media platforms. As a significant benefit to the forum was chosen timing, that coincided with a debate in the public space of the Latvian participation in the development of tools and especially referendum voting mechanism.

Video

Photos

Network
Find all related publications
Publications
22/07/2026

How (not) to fight the far right

FEPS YAN papers 9th cycle
20/07/2026

Avoiding renovictions in European cities

FEPS YAN papers 9th cycle
20/07/2026

Housing the people

FEPS YAN papers 9th cycle
20/07/2026

Participatory budgeting in Europe

Building trust and widening participation
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
16/07/2026

Good luck! And don’t f**k it up…

Hungary beyond the elections: a fragile chance for LGBTQI+
02/07/2026

A pact: what else?

The entry into force of the EU’s Pact on Migration and Asylum on 12 June […]
02/07/2026

The EU Return Regulation: what lies behind the chants

The new EU ‘deportation bill’ was adopted by the European Parliament amid roaring applause, laughter […]
Find all related news
News
08/07/2026

Letter to Manfred Weber, Chair of the EPP Group, by FEPS President Nicolas Schmit 

Dear Mr Weber, You are European, but also German. One should be entitled to expect […]
23/06/2026

FEPS Reacts: 10 years after Brexit

Written by FEPS Secretary-General László Andor 🔸 Brexit has been a case study in national self-harm. The […]
05/06/2026

Call for a progressive EU enlargement

Friends of the Western Balkans' Joint Statement
13/04/2026

Hungary’s civic revolution

FEPS' commentary on the outcomes of the Hungarian election
Find all related in the media
In the media

Carta a Manfred Weber

by elDiario.es 17/07/2026
"Letter to Manfred Weber". FEPS President Nicolas Schmit wrote to Manfred Letter, leader of the EPP, on the outcome of the Return Relugation, available in Spanish on elDiario.es.

Open letter to Manfred Weber

by Social Europe 13/07/2026
FEPS President Nicolas Schmit's open letter to EPP leader Manfred Weber on the Return Regulation was featured in Social Europe

Elon Musk não existiria na Europa, porque nunca teria recebido tanto dinheiro de um orçamento público como recebeu nos EUA

by Expresso 24/06/2026
FEPS President and former Commissioner Nicolas Schmit explains how social democrats can regain the trust of EU citizens

Diez años del Brexit: la metamorfosis del euroescepticismo

by La Razón 24/06/2026
"Ten years of Brexit: the metamorphosis of Euroscepticism". This article from La Razón mentions FEPS policy brief "Countering the far right in the European Parliament", which examines the growing normalisation of far-right parties within the EP and analyses how their strategy has shifted from rejecting the EU to reshaping it from within.