Short Summary Energy Focus Group

20/03/2014

Initial summary of the discussions of the Energy Focus Group. More details to follow.

In terms of what to expect at the Council summit, many anticipate that the situation in Ukraine will shadow the climate and energy debates. Consequently it’s possible that no real decisions will be taken and instead more of a timeline on when the decisions will be taken.

It seems that there are still a lot of divergence between member states on what and how the targets should be.

In the general discussion in our focus group, it was agreed that in the end that although it is important to have ambitious targets, and that learning from the past set of targets if they are not legally binding they will not be reached, however there is more at stake. The framework doesn’t get into the policy detail of how the framework will be implemented, also what the investment  and infrastructure plans and costs are likely to be for instance.

A lot comes down to the Emissions Trading Scheme and how and when this will be revived especially when considering our Greenhouse gas emissions.

Many NGOs felt that the framework doesn’t go far enough. The MEPs are quite happy from the progressive side, from the Parliamentary report which heavily criticised the Commission white paper. Whereas the energy companies feel that the current framework does not give enough long-term predictability.

Background

The meeting of the energy focus group took place just before the European Council of Ministers summit which addresses the 2030 climate and energy framework.
Proposed by the European Commission in January and heavily criticised by the European Parliament this package is about to be decided at the Council summit. The seminar will focus on the original negotiations and the recommendations of the European Parliament looking towards outcomes that the Council may bring.
 
The focus group is a series of closed seminars with invited experts from a range of fields to discuss energy issues.

Find all related publications
Publications
09/12/2024

China: Dangerous rival or cooperation partner?

How can EU-China relations develop in a changing world with geopolitical conflicts?
09/12/2024

Time to build a European digital ecosystem

Recommendations for the EU’s digital policy
06/12/2024

Feminist Foreign Policy Progressive Voices Collective

Policy recommendations
06/12/2024

A feminist foreign policy approach to EU security and defence

A contradiction in terms
Find all related news
News
03/12/2024

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues at the 2024 Understanding China Conference

03/12/2024

Joint statement by the Friends of the Western Balkans (FoWB) 

15/11/2024

Ahead of G20, FEPS president at the T20 and C20 Summit 2024

07/11/2024

US election results

Reaction by FEPS Secretary General
Find all related in the media
In the media

Study: EU needs a clear strategy for digital independence

by Europe.Table 09/12/2024
Read the coverage of our policy study 'Time to build a European digital ecosystem', in which experts call for the development of a European digital industrial policy.

Europe needs to have its own criteria to assess relationship with China

by Global Times 04/12/2024
Read this interview with FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues, as she delves into the intricate relationship between Europe and China, highlighting the opportunities a global partnership could create to improve global governance.

Record number of foreign attendees attend 2024 Understanding China Conference

by Global Times 03/12/2024
Read this Global Times article featuring an interview with FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues, where she emphasises the need to explore diverse pathways for the China-Europe relationship, moving beyond systemic rivalry

Migration in Europe: Planning for tomorrow’s crises

by Voxeurop 03/12/2024
This article explores a vital question: What direction will Europe's migration policy take in the future? It draws on insights from FEPS policy study, 'Meeting the challenges from the populist right', presenting alternative strategies to address migration crises without mirroring the far right’s divisive tactics.