Future Development if the EU – “We have no more time!”

Conference on the Future Development of the European Union Speaking points by  President of FEPS, […]

28/11/2012

Conference on the Future Development of the European Union

Speaking points by  President of FEPS, Massimo D’Alema

We have no more time! It has been said before and it must be said again: the crisis of detachment between European citizens and their representative institutions is a profound one. Indeed, it is so deep that we are now confronted with the risk of break-up if we fail to act courageously and rapidly. We have had enough of prevarication and stalled negotiation processes. If Europe does not move on from the present state of near inaction, it could be the end of European democracy as we have come to know it.

At its most basic level, this is a crisis of legitimacy for the European Union. The only way to restore and save this legitimacy is to show a strong initiative to resolve the Euro crisis. Among the citizens of Europe, the only way to achieve legitimacy is to deliver on the promises of the European project. Furthermore, legitimacy depends on the criteria of what should be delivered. This cannot be decided by limited interests who control the narrative. Rather it should encompass several elements which take in different perspectives.

By my reading, the only “win-win” deal would be one which accepts two distinct but compatible points of view. The present German government argues for the necessity of more integrated European Union governance. Controversially for some, this includes EU oversight over national budgets. However, the trade-off must be that the deal accepts the French perspective that demands the inclusion of an effective mechanism for solidarity and a strategy for growth. Crucially, this would include providing the European Union with sufficient resources, thus necessitating an increase of the EU budget.

Then there is the more fundamental question of Europe’s place in the world. We are forced by globalisation to transform Europe into a real political entity. In a way, the United States of Europe already exists through the common currency and single market. However, it lacks the institutional tools and effective and full democratic rights for the citizens.

Looking at our friends across the Atlantic Ocean, we can see some basic differences. If an American wants to have higher taxes for the rich and an increase in social spending, he or she could vote for Obama in the recent Presidential elections. Conversely, if he or she preferred tax breaks for the rich and cuts to spending, they could vote for Romney.

Most importantly, Americans have the option to remove the proponents of one particular philosophy from office every few years. Yet this is impossible for European citizens. They are encumbered by the constraints of institutions that pretend to be neutral. Politics is hidden under a veil of technocracy to the detriment of democratic legitimacy.

European citizens feel like they cannot influence the democratic process. Whereas in the US, discontent citizens oppose particular “Administrations”, they never disregard their fundamental belonging to the American polity. In Europe, discontent citizens will openly oppose the European Union itself.

We risk the failure of the European democracy which took so long to build.

There is also a disconnect of politics and policy. Politics is carried out at a national level while policy is decided at a technocratic level in Brussels. Politics without real delivery reduces the national parliaments of Europe to a series of “talking shops” with no real bearing on the lives of people.

The only alternative is to accelerate the politicisation of the EU. This must include a Commission president chosen based on the outcome of the European elections. It includes stronger political parties at EU level. The discussion of a conflict of national sovereignty and EU integration is a thing of the past. We must strengthen EU sovereignty.

Find all related publications
Publications
11/06/2025

Social Democracy with(out) people

Possible strategies for survival and expansion of the Polish left
20/05/2025

Demonetisation of anti-democratic and extreme content

The proposed European Democracy Shield (EUDS) aims to fortify the EU’s democratic systems against disinformation, […]
05/05/2025

Shaping a European budget fit for climate action and a just transition

The negotiations for the next EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) – the long-term budget at […]
28/04/2025

Housing as investment in Greece and Southern Europe

Private profit vs social value
Find all related news
News
16/05/2025

Joint statement by the Friends of the Western Balkans (FoWB)

Ljubljana, 16th May 2025 We, the Friends of the Western Balkans (FoWB) – representatives of […]
25/04/2025

Call for tender – Editorial services for FEPS recurrent flagship publications

This call for tender is now closed
13/03/2025

Europe’s defence strategy must be peace-oriented

FEPS Position Paper on European defence
10/03/2025

FEPS reaction to the Roadmap on Women’s Rights

On Friday 7 March, the European Commission presented its Roadmap for Women’s Rights ahead of […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

L’Europa del futuro: se ne parla a Siena. “Il dialogo per affrontare anni difficili

by La Nazione 04/06/2025
FEPS, and FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues, participation in the 6th Siena Conference on the Future of Europe is discussed in this article

An EU budget for growth and cohesion

by Encompass 02/06/2025
FEPS SecGen László Andor discusses the upcoming Multiannual Financial Framework proposal for Encompass

Evropske socijaldemokrate traže od institucija Unije da razmotre pojedinačne sankcije protiv onih koji krše ljudska prava u Srbiji

by nova.rs 21/05/2025
The Friends of the Western Balkans 7th meeting and political statement on the Serbian student protests is discussed in this article.

Navigating Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) with clarity: Beyond regulation turmoil towards resilience

by Le Mensuel d'Agéfi Luxembourg 21/05/2025
This article highlights the importance of treating ESG as more than a mere compliance exercise. It uses data from FEPS policy study "Builders of Progress" to show young people's perspective on the matter.