A YEAR AFTER: Transatlantic relations in a time of risk

It has been one year since perhaps the most consequential U.S. election in memory. Americans […]

02/02/2018

It has been one year since perhaps the most consequential U.S. election in memory. Americans as well as onlookers across the globe have witnessed a new style of U.S. foreign policy. Several traditional patterns of diplomacy and relationships of alliance have been overlooked, and policy is no longer communicated in speeches and press releases, but rather in 140 character tweets. The White House’s new type of foreign policy communication and messaging has left many questioning which direction of U.S. foreign policy. The United States faces a number of key challenges including a nuclear threat from North Korea, potential changes to the Iran nuclear deal, an increasingly influential China, and Russian aggression in Eastern Europe and beyond.

Many of the Trump administration’s responses to these challenges have been vague and unpredictable. And, with much of the president’s communication contradicting other administration announcements, the impact of his policies are called into question. How do we expect U.S. foreign policy to continue to evolve over the coming three years? Is this the end of traditional deliberate diplomacy? What impact will this new type of engagement have on foreign policy and U.S. influence across the globe? What does it mean for relations with Europe?

These questions along with a number of others formed the focus of an interesting discussion that was co-organised by the Foundation for European Progressive Studies and the German Marshall Fund of the United States on November 14th 2017 in Brussels. The event brought together Heather Conley, Senior Vice President for Europe, Eurasia, and the Arctic, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Kelly Magsamen, Vice President for National Security and International Policy, Center for American Progress and Nathalie Tocci, Director, Istituto Affari Internazionali, to offer their insights on what we have learnt almost a year after the election of Donald Trump as US president. The discussion was moderated by Ian Lesser, Vice President, The German Marshall Fund of the United States and was opened by Ernst Stetter, FEPS Secretary General.

Read the activity report

Network
Center for American Progress
German Marshall Fund
Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI)
Find all related publications
Publications
11/05/2026

Place-based industrial policy

Places, people and power in European industrial policy
17/04/2026

The open future and its enemies

How we can protect free society from AI dictatorship
17/04/2026

EqualiZe

Gender differences in political opinion and voting among Generation Z
27/03/2026

Laboratories of counter-hegemony

Orbán, Trump and the transatlantic far-right ecosystem
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
13/05/2026

The race for the most impossible job in the world

Antonio Guterres’ term as UN Secretary-General (UNSG) ends on 31 December 2026. The final decision for […]
12/05/2026

The inconvenience is not ours

When the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran on 28 February, killing the […]
07/05/2026

Competitiveness is nothing without social rights

Five years after the Porto Social Summit, European leaders must remember that deregulation will only […]
Find all related news
News
13/04/2026

Hungary’s civic revolution

FEPS' commentary on the outcomes of the Hungarian election
05/03/2026

The new EU Gender Equality Strategy 2026-2030

Commentary by the Feminist Foreign Policy Progressive Voices Collective (FFPPVC)
03/03/2026

Wag the dog?

FEPS commentary on the US-Israel attack on Iran
03/03/2026

Closing ceremony of the Progressive Ukraine programme

The graduation ceremony completed the programme which was part of the Open Progressive University (OPU).
Find all related in the media
In the media

Ue, la competitività non è nulla senza i diritti sociali

by La Repubblica 06/05/2026
"In the EU, competitiveness is nothing without social rights" In this article published in La Repubblica, former European Commissioners Nicolas Schmit (FEPS President), László Andor (FEPS SecGen) and Anna Diamantopoúlou (part of FEPS' Bureau) remind European leaders that deregulation will only make Europe poorer and that only social sovereignty will make it stronger

A competitividade não é nada sem direitos sociais

by Publico 06/05/2026
"Competitiveness is nothing without social rights." Writing for Público, former European Commissioners Nicolas Schmit (FEPS President), László Andor (FEPS SecGen), and Anna Diamantopoúlou (FEPS Bureau) argue that competitiveness is hollow without social rights. They caution European leaders that a path of deregulation will only lead to widespread poverty, asserting instead that "social sovereignty" is the true key to a stronger Europe.

Andor László: Átváltozó Európa

by Portfolio 06/05/2026
"László Andor: Europe in Transformation" In this article published in Portfolio, former European Commissioners Nicolas Schmit (FEPS President), László Andor (FEPS SecGen) and Anna Diamantopoúlou (part of FEPS' Bureau) remind European leaders that deregulation will only make Europe poorer. They argue that as the continent faces a "stalled" German economy and shifting global dynamics, only social sovereignty and a renewed social contract can truly make the Union stronger.

Nincs versenyképesség szociális jogok nélkül

by Népszava 06/05/2026
"There is no competitiveness without social rights" In an article published in Népszava, former European Commissioners Nicolas Schmit (FEPS President), László Andor (FEPS Secretary General), and Anna Diamantopoúlou (FEPS Bureau member) issue a firm reminder to European leaders, deregulation will only serve to make Europe poorer. They argue that the continent's true strength lies not in market dilution, but in social sovereignty.