A YEAR AFTER: Transatlantic relations in a time of risk

It has been one year since perhaps the most consequential U.S. election in memory. Americans […]

02/02/2018

It has been one year since perhaps the most consequential U.S. election in memory. Americans as well as onlookers across the globe have witnessed a new style of U.S. foreign policy. Several traditional patterns of diplomacy and relationships of alliance have been overlooked, and policy is no longer communicated in speeches and press releases, but rather in 140 character tweets. The White House’s new type of foreign policy communication and messaging has left many questioning which direction of U.S. foreign policy. The United States faces a number of key challenges including a nuclear threat from North Korea, potential changes to the Iran nuclear deal, an increasingly influential China, and Russian aggression in Eastern Europe and beyond.

Many of the Trump administration’s responses to these challenges have been vague and unpredictable. And, with much of the president’s communication contradicting other administration announcements, the impact of his policies are called into question. How do we expect U.S. foreign policy to continue to evolve over the coming three years? Is this the end of traditional deliberate diplomacy? What impact will this new type of engagement have on foreign policy and U.S. influence across the globe? What does it mean for relations with Europe?

These questions along with a number of others formed the focus of an interesting discussion that was co-organised by the Foundation for European Progressive Studies and the German Marshall Fund of the United States on November 14th 2017 in Brussels. The event brought together Heather Conley, Senior Vice President for Europe, Eurasia, and the Arctic, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Kelly Magsamen, Vice President for National Security and International Policy, Center for American Progress and Nathalie Tocci, Director, Istituto Affari Internazionali, to offer their insights on what we have learnt almost a year after the election of Donald Trump as US president. The discussion was moderated by Ian Lesser, Vice President, The German Marshall Fund of the United States and was opened by Ernst Stetter, FEPS Secretary General.

Read the activity report

Network
Center for American Progress
German Marshall Fund
Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI)
Find all related publications
Publications
17/04/2026

The open future and its enemies

How we can protect free society from AI dictatorship
17/04/2026

EqualiZe

A new political gender divide is often said to be defining Gen Z in Europe: […]
27/03/2026

Laboratories of counter-hegemony

Orbán, Trump and the transatlantic far-right ecosystem
25/03/2026

The European Green Deal tracker

How well is your member state implementing key policies of the Green Deal? The European […]
Find all related news
News
13/04/2026

Hungary’s civic revolution

FEPS' commentary on the outcomes of the Hungarian election
05/03/2026

FFPPVC commentary on the new EU Gender Equality Strategy 2026-2030

Commentary by the Feminist Foreign Policy Progressive Voices Collective (FFPPVC)
03/03/2026

Wag the dog?

FEPS commentary on the US-Israel attack on Iran
03/03/2026

Closing ceremony of the Progressive Ukraine programme

The graduation ceremony completed the programme which was part of the Open Progressive University (OPU).
Find all related in the media
In the media

What next for Olivér Várhelyi, Orbán’s last man standing in Brussels?

by EURACTIV 14/04/2026
FEPS Secretary General László Andor discusses the potential impact of the HUngarian election result on EU Commissioner, Olivér Várhely

EU relieved to see back of Orbán but Magyar’s Hungary may still present problems

by The Guardian 14/04/2026
FEPS Secretary General László Andor comments on Hungary's future following the outcome of the 2026 general election

Bilancio UE: fondi sociali in bilico, l’Europarlamento chiede più risorse e meno flessibilità

by Il Sole 24 Ore 13/04/2026
"EU budget: social funds at risk, the European Parliament calls for more resources and less flexibility" In this article by Il Sole 24 ore, FEPS Secretary General László Andor highlights the risks that the current MFF proposal - set to be voted on by the European Parliament - could pose to the EU budget and outlines the consequences of reducing social funding.

Világháború, vagy amit akartok

by Mérce 18/03/2026
"World War, or what you will". FEPS Secretary-General László Andor escalating conflict between the USA, Israel, and Iran and the lack of 'brakes' to prevent escalation from Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu.