The EU cannot be flexible on its principles with Brexit

It was only this July that for the first time, more than two years after […]


It was only this July that for the first time, more than two years after the Brexit-referendum, British Prime Minister Theresa May presented a more detailed vision on the future relationship between the UK and the EU-27 after Brexit and the end of the already agreed transition period on 31 December 2020. Negotiations could thus move on from “divorce questions” about payments and citizens’ rights to the more complicated question of forging out a durable economic (and security) partnership for the benefit of both partners, which is also a pre-condition for solving the Irish border question.

Briefly, the UK government’s white paper envisions an association agreement with the EU, which includes a free trade area limited to goods, a dispute resolution mechanism and a continuous dialogue between the two partners. The question is, if this plan is a basis on which an agreement can be found within a framework that allows trade to flow as smoothly and frictionless as possible. In order to avoid a no-deal-scenario and a cliff-edge, many commentators, especially in the UK, demand a more ‘flexible approach’ from Brussels. There should be no doubt that the EU would like to see the UK staying as close as possible to the Union it is still part of and indeed, the EU has a variety of different arrangements with third countries, with different degrees of trade liberalisation and different institutional frameworks. However, the EU’s margin for manoeuvre and thus any potential flexibility are limited by its own principles, its economic interest, and its raison d’être.

Read the paper

Find all related publications

Talking Green in Europe

Lessons on re-framing the public debate on the climate crisis

Just Transition & Revitalisation – A New EU Strategy for Rural Areas

How can EU actions support the revitalisation of rural areas? How can EU institutions put […]

How to address Europe’s green investment gap

This policy brief presents the combined findings of the three policy studies on climate investment […]

Talking Green Hungary

Public perception of a just green transition in Hungary
Find all related events
03 - 04/06/2022
Stockholm (Sweden)

Just Transition: The path to a healthy planet for the prosperity of all

Stockholm (Sweden), 3 June 2022 Urgent action is needed to prevent the breakdown of our climate and […]

Policy Measures for a Just Transition

12 May 2022 Ideas for Designing a Structural Transformation to Reduce Inequalities Policy discussions in […]

Circular Economy Book Launch (Latvian version)

25 April 2022 FEPS is glad to release the English version of the panel discussion hosted by the Freedom […]
Find all related news

FEPS joins the European Alliance for a Just Transition

We are delighted to announce that FEPS joins the European Alliance for a Just Transition […]

FEPS article series on intergenerational solidarity and the need for climate justice

This article series aims to inform on the ways in which intergenerational solidarity can be […]

New Policy Report on the Green Deal: achieving sustainability and equity in a post-COVID-19 era

The Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS), together with the Institute for European Environmental Policy […]

UNited for Climate Justice – New York Conference

On the occasion of this year’s annual conference taking place on the fringes of the […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

Leaders Must Choose a Just Energy Transition and a Social Europe

by Euractiv 30/05/2022

The circular economy and green jobs

by ENCOMPASS 25/05/2022

Da Prodi a Rodrigues, domani al via la ’Terza conferenza sul futuro dell’Europa’

by La Nazione 25/05/2022

€10 trillion in green public investments to grow out of climate change