Should Central Banks Discipline Governments?

The collateral frameworks of central banks have always been a core aspect of monetary policy, […]

09/03/2020

The collateral frameworks of central banks have always been a core aspect of monetary policy, but they have rarely been subject to scholarly scrutiny. Kjell Nyborg’s (2017) recent book is a notable exception. Focusing on post-crisis central banking in Europe, Nyborg argues that market inputs to the collateral policies of the European Central Bank (ECB) are so limited that they have inadvertently undermined market discipline, to the detriment of resource allocation and economic growth and, notably, to the detriment of fiscal prudence in EU member states. Nyborg holds that the way forward in central banking is to give collateral policies a disciplinary role, such that the costs of central bank funding increase when fiscal deficits and public debt approach and surpass agreed thresholds.

Nyborg’s work is misguided, however, both in terms of its analysis and the policies it advocates. Drawing upon the money view literature (Mehrling 2011, 2012, 2014), we argue that disciplinary central banking along the lines advocated by Nyborg would be destabilising, economically as well as politically. In fact, the proposed modality of central banking is the opposite of what is needed to foster financial stability in financial systems where money and capital markets are closely intertwined. The very notion of “market discipline” – core to much mainstream thinking on central banking – is predicated on a funding liquidity logic, ill-suited for market liquidity concerns.

The upshot is that the more collateral policies embed the asset valuation practices of financial market participants in central bank crisis interventions, the more destabilising those interventions will be. If central banks are to succeed in preserving market liquidity, two criteria are key: central banks must backstop the market values of core collateral assets, and their collateral policies must be unequivocally non-discriminatory and countercyclical.

Read the paper

Find all related publications
Publications
28/03/2023

Back to the Dark Ages?

Q-commerce, rapid retail and the changing landscape of retail work
28/03/2023

Getting the goods

Trade unions and strategy in the quick-commerce sector
24/03/2023

Making Next-Generation EU a permanent tool

Recovery Watch series
15/03/2023

A five-point agenda for how development cooperation can support EU’s strategic autonomy

European Strategic Autonomy series - Economy & Trade
Find all related events
Events
Upcoming
12/04/2023
Online (Expert meeting)

Social measures in the NRRPs

Recovery Watch series
Past
14/03/2023
Dublin, Ireland

EU fiscal rules: Time for a reboot?

FEPS policy study launch
28/03/2023
FEPS HQ (Hybrid)

Dark stores: Back to the Dark Ages?

Launch event of policy study into the q-commerce sector
Find all related news
News
20/02/2023

Let’s end involuntary unemployment!

European survey on the perception of unemployment and publicly funded jobs
20/12/2022

How to make the best use of the Resilience and Recovery Fund

The first results of the Recovery Watch research project were presented to the Italian public in Rome on 15 December
18/10/2022

Open letter to call for a deep reform of the EU fiscal rules

FEPS cosigned an open letter to EU leaders calling for them to address the underlying structural […]
30/05/2022

FEPS launches ‘Recovery Watch’, a new research project

The National Recovery and Resilience Plans represent the new framework in which member states will identify their […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

En Europe, le marché unique fête ses 30 ans, entre satisfaction et désillusion

by Le Monde 01/02/2023
'In Europe, the single market celebrates its 30th anniversary, between satisfaction and disillusionment' Le Monde article with an intervention by László Andor, FEPS Secretary General

L’Italia non riesce a usare il Pnrr: abbiamo speso solo un terzo dei 42 miliardi di euro stanziati

by L'Espresso 09/01/2023
'Italy fails to take advantage of the NRRP: we have spent only one-third of the 42 billion euros allocated' L'Espresso article on the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Plans.

Gli effetti della crisi sulle famiglie e sul settore dell’agricoltura

by Radio Vaticana 19/12/2022
"The impact of the crisis on families and the agricultural sector" Radio Vaticana. Interview (18'45) with David Rinaldi, FEPS Director of Studies and Policy, on the Recovery Watch series of publications

Nuova economia ok, ma l’inquinamento?

by Il Fatto Quotidiano 19/12/2022
"A new economy OK, but what about pollution?" Il Fatto Quotidiano article on FEPS Policy Study "Policy challenges and actions for a just climate transition"