More Europe versus No Europe. Institutional Reforms and Euroscepticism on the eve of the 2014 European elections

This is the leading theme of the conference that FEPS together with Italiani Europei and […]
Speakers

06 - 08/04/2014
00:00:00 - 00:00:00
Rome Rome, Italy
More Europe versus No Europe. Institutional Reforms and Euroscepticism on the eve of the 2014 European elections
55999
132-more-europe-versus-no-europe-institutional-reforms-and-euroscepticism-on-the-eve-of-the-2014-european-elections
0

In order to give you access to our events, FEPS processes your personal data together with any other organiser of this event mentioned in the description of the event and in accordance with 'FEPS’ data protection policy.

This is the leading theme of the conference that FEPS together with Italiani Europei and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Büro in Rome are holding together on Monday, 7th April 2014 in the capital of Italy. The event is expected to gather academics, representatives of civil society and politicians; and as such, it is already the second activity of the common cycle “Democratic Legitimacy and Political Leadership in the European Union”, which feeds in the deliberations on EU-democracy and europarties one of the pillars of the FEPS Next Left Research Programme.

With less than a hundred days remaining till the European citizens will go to the polling stations, there are many prognoses fueling the political debates. On one side, there is a strong feeling that the voters will demand a change of direction for Europe; on the other there is a fear that they will potentially turn to protest and populist forces. Hence there are many speculations regarding the possible result, as also potential for any eventual future coalition within the context of the European Parliaments and subsequently while completing the election for the President of the European Commission. This position carries now more than an institutional meaning. It is symbolic – not only in terms of mirroring an eventual shift in terms of political leadership, but also (depending on the negotiations’ outcome) offering a blueprint for a new balance between the intergovernmental and federal pillars of the EU.

The elections themselves will constitute the first chance for the citizens take the position on how to resume the European integration trajectory while still most evidently searching the ways out of the crisis. They are also the first ones during which, as hinted before, Lisbon Treaty will be used to a greater extent. There is therefore a hope that it will be an opportunity for the europarties to assume their new position, entering actively into the campaigns. With personalisation related already presented top candidates one hand, and more financial and structural support them on the other, the europarties may hope to assume more of political leadership in that context. The clearer cleavages in between pan-European visions can be a factor in politicising Europe and making the participation in them more meaningful to the voters. Empowered with their mandate, the europarties may stand a chance to enter into a new stage of development and in parallel transform the vote from the 2nd order election onto another level.

These are all the hopes, which stand a chance to be fulfilled – however the electoral map still looks truly complicated. The progressives, who identify themselves as a pro-European movement, face therefore a very difficult task. They need to convey a message of change, while at the same time not leaving a space for the anti-Europeanism that flourish currently on the wave of the criticism of the Union. They need to formulate a strong agenda, while not giving in the rhetoric of “TINA” (There is No Alternative). And then they also need to claim ownership of the policy issue, while enforcing a different style of policy making and politicizing the European political sphere herewith.

These themes frame the programme, which will feature two panels and a closing, political session. The two debating rounds will be based on papers drafted respectively by Dr. Eleonora Poli, Research Fellow at IAI and Dr. Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Senior Research Fellow. These two contributions will be opening the discussions, within which the first respondents are respectively two FEPS Next Left Working Group Members: Dr. André Krouwel, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Free University of Amsterdam and Dr. David Bailey, Lecturer at the Department of Political Science and International Studies
School of Government and Society of University of Birmingham.

For more information, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. Ania Skrzypek, FEPS Senior Research Fellow at ania.skrzypek@feps-europe.eu or Ms. Ischi Graus, FEPS Events Organiser at ischi.graus@feps-europe.eu The material of the previous seminar you can find here: https://www.feps-europe.eu/en/news/369_democratic-legitimacy-and-political-leadership-in-the-european-union

Find all related publications
Publications
14/08/2026

A just transition in the Mediterranean

Rebalancing the burdens and benefits of EU-North Africa energy cooperation
31/07/2026

Beyond the “Gaza Riviera” Approach

Preserving identity and supporting Palestine’s landscape and social fabric
22/07/2026

How (not) to fight the far right

FEPS YAN papers 9th cycle
20/07/2026

Avoiding renovictions in European cities

FEPS YAN papers 9th cycle
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
16/07/2026

Good luck! And don’t f**k it up…

Hungary beyond the elections: a fragile chance for LGBTQI+
02/07/2026

A pact: what else?

The entry into force of the EU’s Pact on Migration and Asylum on 12 June […]
02/07/2026

The EU Return Regulation: what lies behind the chants

The new EU ‘deportation bill’ was adopted by the European Parliament amid roaring applause, laughter […]
Find all related Audiovisual
Audiovisual
20/07/2026

‘DON’T let AI take over your capability to THINK and be CREATIVE’ with Katarina Barley

AI continues to remain a priority topic on the political agenda. As the EU leverages […]
20/07/2026

‘DON’T let AI take over your capability to THINK and be CREATIVE’ with Katarina Barley

AI continues to remain a priority topic on the political agenda. As the EU leverages […]
27/06/2026

The POLITICAL dimension of the US FIFA World Cup with Cas Mudde

📺🔊 Available on YouTube, Spotify & Apple Podcast This FIFA World Cup may be the […]
27/06/2026

The POLITICAL dimension of the US FIFA World Cup with Cas Mudde

📺🔊 Available on YouTube, Spotify & Apple Podcast This FIFA World Cup may be the […]
Find all related news
News
23/07/2026

FEPS Reacts: European Commission communication on the Action Plan on the European Pillar of Social Rights

By Laszlo Andor, FEPS Secretary-General & François Balate, Policy Analyst on Social The communication on the […]
08/07/2026

Letter to Manfred Weber, Chair of the EPP Group, by FEPS President Nicolas Schmit 

Dear Mr Weber, You are European, but also German. One should be entitled to expect […]
23/06/2026

FEPS Reacts: 10 years after Brexit

Written by FEPS Secretary-General László Andor 🔸 Brexit has been a case study in national self-harm. The […]
05/06/2026

Call for a progressive EU enlargement

Friends of the Western Balkans' Joint Statement
Find all related in the media
In the media

Carta a Manfred Weber

by elDiario.es 17/07/2026
"Letter to Manfred Weber". FEPS President Nicolas Schmit wrote to Manfred Letter, leader of the EPP, on the outcome of the Return Relugation, available in Spanish on elDiario.es.

Open letter to Manfred Weber

by Social Europe 13/07/2026
FEPS President Nicolas Schmit's open letter to EPP leader Manfred Weber on the Return Regulation was featured in Social Europe

Elon Musk não existiria na Europa, porque nunca teria recebido tanto dinheiro de um orçamento público como recebeu nos EUA

by Expresso 24/06/2026
FEPS President and former Commissioner Nicolas Schmit explains how social democrats can regain the trust of EU citizens

Diez años del Brexit: la metamorfosis del euroescepticismo

by La Razón 24/06/2026
"Ten years of Brexit: the metamorphosis of Euroscepticism". This article from La Razón mentions FEPS policy brief "Countering the far right in the European Parliament", which examines the growing normalisation of far-right parties within the EP and analyses how their strategy has shifted from rejecting the EU to reshaping it from within.