Monetary v. Economic Policy: A Bug in the Maastricht Design?

Read the Study With an order issued on 14 January 2014, the German Federal Constitutional […]

Policy Study

12/04/2016

Read the Study

With an order issued on 14 January 2014, the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), for the first time in its history, referred a question to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling under Article 267(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The controversy concerns the Outright Monetary Transaction (OMT) programme, consisting in the potentially unlimited purchase of sovereign bonds by the European Central Bank (ECB) on the secondary market.

The OMT case is situated at the crossroad of a bundle of legal, economic and political issues. In particular, it directly concerns the asymmetric construction of the Economic and Monetary Union, as designed in the Maastricht Treaty, and now based on the rules contained in Title VIII of Part III of the TFEU. In particular, the Economic and Monetary Union is built on the separation between a “single monetary policy”, governed by the ECB, and the “close coordination of Member States’ economic policies”, whose definition remains the competence of the national governments. The definition of the boundaries between “economic” and “monetary” policies is, indeed, at the heart of the dispute between the FCC and the ECB.

The paper will argue that such controversial separation between “economic” and “monetary” policies reflects a wrong political choice made at the time of the Maastricht Treaty, based on a neoliberal approach that has proven to be inadequate to face the challenges brought by the financial crisis. To this end, the paper will investigate the (strictly interconnected) legal and economic issues deriving from the separation, operated by the Treaty, between “economic” and “monetary” policies. In particular, the legal and the economic arguments will be jointly analysed in order to demonstrate how the attempt to “constitutionalise” a flawed economic theory has resulted into a number of legal contradictions, some of which have reached the surface in the OMT case. The paper aims, therefore, at investigating the legal and economic issues deriving from the separation, operated by the Treaty, between “economic” and “monetary” policies, and to present a set of proposals to correct and overcome the Maastricht design. 

Find all related publications
Publications
17/06/2025

Lessons learned from the Recovery and Resilience Facility for a future European fiscal capacity

The creation of the Recovery and Resilience Fund (RRF) as a response to the pandemic […]
05/05/2025

Shaping a European budget fit for climate action and a just transition

The negotiations for the next EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) – the long-term budget at […]
22/04/2025

Trade, trust, and transition: Shaping the next transatlantic chapter

Essays series by FEPS and Center for American Progress (CAP)
08/04/2025

The profit-price spiral in food and energy

Analysis and toolbox to fight inflation
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
11/04/2025

Trump’s tariff boomerang

Most trade pundits (and a few others) were shocked by the magnitude of Trump’s tariff […]
11/04/2025

Trade as a force for good jobs

Tariffs and trade wars are never good for workers who inevitably end up paying the […]
Find all related events
Events
Upcoming
03/09/2025
Brussels, Belgium

Inflation preparedness in the EU

Lessons learned and a new Inflation Governance Framework
Past
17/06/2025
Bratislava, Slovakia

The role of profits in the European inflation shock

The case of Slovakia
19 - 21/06/2025
Siena, Italy

Siena Vision Conference on the Europe of the Future – 2025

Time to be bold
Find all related news
News
26/02/2025

FEPS reaction to the European Commission’s Clean Industrial Deal

What Teresa Ribera presented today is an ambitious plan that makes the case for Europe […]
07/02/2025

FEPS President on the European car industry and the Competitive Compass on Euronews ‘Brussels, my love?’

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues took part in the Euronews talk show ‘Brussels, my love?‘ […]
27/06/2024

Join Tax the EU Billionaires Day!

Do you know that the richest 1% in Europe owns half of European wealth? Join […]
18/01/2024

FEPS President at Euronews talk-show ‘Brussels, my love?’

Alongside German conservative MEP Lars Patrick Berg and Fabian Zuleeg, Chief economist and director of […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

Tévedés azt hinni, hogy Trump után visszatérhetünk a régi kerékvágásba

by telex 24/04/2025
“It’s a mistake to think we can go back to the old normal after Trump”. Interview with FEPS Secretary General László Andor in Telex (HU), where he discusses the global trade tensions triggered by Trump-era tariffs, the shifting US-China dynamic, and the need for the EU to develop a new strategic approach in a permanently changed world order.

Brussels, my love? Europe’s economy in a struggle for survival

by Euronews 21/10/2024
FEPS director of studies and policy David Rinaldi participated in this episode of Euronews’ show ‘Brussels my love’.

Megadóztatná a szupergazdagokat? Ha igen, most tehet valamit

by Zöld Hang 04/10/2024
'Would you tax the super-rich? If so, you can do something now' Interview to FEPS Secretary General, László Andor on the 'Tax the rich' EU initiative by the Hungarian newspaper Zöld Hang.

Orbánov boj z zunanjim sovražnikom ni bil kos inflaciji

by DELO 28/05/2024
In an article in Delo, László Andor criticises Viktor Orbán government's economic policies, such as not allowing Hungary to join the euro area, which he believes would have helped curb inflation. He also criticises the government for blaming external enemies such as the President of the European Commission, to cover up its own failures.