Capital and Labour in the post-crisis European context

Capital and Labour in the post-crisis European context: Distributional, Institutional and Political Considerations VOLUME 1: […]

Policy Study

13/04/2016

Capital and Labour in the post-crisis European context: Distributional, Institutional and Political Considerations

VOLUME 1: Financial Means and Labour 

Read the study

Declining or stagnant wages, the attitude of the European Commission and beneficial tax systems for capital lead on several levels to a weakening position not only of middle and lower class interests but also their institutionalized representatives, i.e. trade unions and progressive parties. This is why we need not only an accurate diagnosis on what is actually creating this weakened position of labour in the post- crisis era but also pan-European policy proposals which go beyond the special interests of certain countries or industrial sectors.

This paper approaches these processes from three different perspectives in order to create a better understanding of the drivers of this weakening of the middle and lower classes in Europe. It provides policy proposals for each one of the three perspectives which are aimed at increasing the position of low and middle income earners. The changing relationship between capital and labour can of course be analysed at various levels of abstraction and can focus on different concrete articulations of this relationship in different policy spheres. With this in mind, this volume does not seek to offer a comprehensive analysis of the changing nature of capital-labour relations in Europe. Rather, it seeks to advance a conceptual framework for analysis as well as new empirical material which together draw attention to three distinct areas through which capital-labour relations in Europe in the post-crisis period can be understood, analysed and critiqued. These three distinct areas are identified in the title of this paper, with its focus on distributional, institutional and political dimensions of the capital-labour relation in Europe.

The first section of the paper places the question of capital-labour relations in its structural context and provides an analysis of changes to the ‘wage share’ in Europe. It outlines how since the 1980s the wage share has declined in Europe and argues that this process is associated with distributional asymmetry and crisis. Empirically, it provides a ‘snapshot’ of the wage share across select European countries in the ‘core’ and the ‘periphery’ between 2008 and 2015. It is argued that on this measure, uneven development has intensified across Europe as a result of crisis management measures.

The second section of the paper looks at the policy responses of the European Commission in this context. It is argued that the Commission’s attitude is most fundamentally geared towards the position and perspective of capital within the economy, rather than the European economy or society as a whole. While the Commission’s position has developed somewhat over the course of the crisis, its adaptability is hindered by these fundamental assumptions.

The final section of the paper focuses on the responses of European trade unions to the contemporary conjuncture. The section advances in two steps. First it outlines the present literature on practices of European trade unions. Second, it illustrates one area – the area of financial regulation – where European trade unions can make a difference for labour relations across the European Union. The section concludes with three organisational policy proposals – in short this is common representation, policy expertise, translationary capacities – in order to improve the position of Labour in the EU.

In a final concluding section we synthesise the above arguments and outline some implications of the preceding analysis.

The three chapters – although speaking to distinct aspects of capital-labour relations in the contemporary conjuncture – can nevertheless be understood to be linked as they all contribute to answering the following two research questions:

  1. How have capital-labour relations been reconstituted in the post-crisis period in Europe and which actors have served to institute, organise and regulate this process?

  2. What alternative strategies might progressive political parties adopt in response to these trends? 

Find all related publications
Publications
05/05/2025

Shaping a European budget fit for climate action and a just transition

The negotiations for the next EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) – the long-term budget at […]
22/04/2025

Trade, trust, and transition: Shaping the next transatlantic chapter

Essays series by FEPS and Center for American Progress (CAP)
08/04/2025

The profit-price spiral in food and energy

Analysis and toolbox to fight inflation
17/02/2025

Expected labour market effects of the Green Deal Industrial Plan (2)

A regional labour policy approach
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
11/04/2025

Trump’s tariff boomerang

Most trade pundits (and a few others) were shocked by the magnitude of Trump’s tariff […]
11/04/2025

Trade as a force for good jobs

Tariffs and trade wars are never good for workers who inevitably end up paying the […]
Find all related events
Events
Upcoming
20/05/2025
Expert Meeting

Lessons learned from the RRF for a future European fiscal capacity

EU Investment Capacity Group
Past
23 - 24/04/2025
Washington DC, USA (Expert meeting)

Trade, trust and transition

Progressive Economics Network (PEN) 2025 meeting in Washington D.C.
11/04/2025
FEPS HQ, Brussels (Stakeholder meeting)

Roadmap to the next MFF

Supporting Just Transition and cohesion
Find all related news
News
26/02/2025

FEPS reaction to the European Commission’s Clean Industrial Deal

What Teresa Ribera presented today is an ambitious plan that makes the case for Europe […]
07/02/2025

FEPS President on the European car industry and the Competitive Compass on Euronews ‘Brussels, my love?’

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues took part in the Euronews talk show ‘Brussels, my love?‘ […]
27/06/2024

Join Tax the EU Billionaires Day!

Do you know that the richest 1% in Europe owns half of European wealth? Join […]
18/01/2024

FEPS President at Euronews talk-show ‘Brussels, my love?’

Alongside German conservative MEP Lars Patrick Berg and Fabian Zuleeg, Chief economist and director of […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

Tévedés azt hinni, hogy Trump után visszatérhetünk a régi kerékvágásba

by telex 24/04/2025
“It’s a mistake to think we can go back to the old normal after Trump”. Interview with FEPS Secretary General László Andor in Telex (HU), where he discusses the global trade tensions triggered by Trump-era tariffs, the shifting US-China dynamic, and the need for the EU to develop a new strategic approach in a permanently changed world order.

Brussels, my love? Europe’s economy in a struggle for survival

by Euronews 21/10/2024
FEPS director of studies and policy David Rinaldi participated in this episode of Euronews’ show ‘Brussels my love’.

Megadóztatná a szupergazdagokat? Ha igen, most tehet valamit

by Zöld Hang 04/10/2024
'Would you tax the super-rich? If so, you can do something now' Interview to FEPS Secretary General, László Andor on the 'Tax the rich' EU initiative by the Hungarian newspaper Zöld Hang.

Orbánov boj z zunanjim sovražnikom ni bil kos inflaciji

by DELO 28/05/2024
In an article in Delo, László Andor criticises Viktor Orbán government's economic policies, such as not allowing Hungary to join the euro area, which he believes would have helped curb inflation. He also criticises the government for blaming external enemies such as the President of the European Commission, to cover up its own failures.