European Union Financial Regulation, Banking Union, Capital Markets Union and the UK

The European Union undertook major reforms of its economic and financial governance framework after the […]

Policy Study

27/01/2017

The European Union undertook major reforms of its economic and financial governance framework after the international financial crisis and the sovereign debt crisis (for an overview, see Journal of Common Market Studies 2009; Review of International Political Economy 2015; and Journal of European Public Policy 2015). Three financial policy areas stand out: financial regulation, which was significantly revised in the wake of the international financial crisis; Banking Union (BU), which was the EU (to be precise, the euro area)’s response to the sovereign debt crisis; and Capital Markets Union (CMU), which was the EU’s attempt to re- vamp financial activities and the real economy after two consecutive crises. These reforms were complex and intertwined. They built on the existing EU framework, notably the Single Financial Market in the case of financial regulation and CMU. The reforms enacted also substantially modified the existing framework, as in the case of BU, which was designed to complete Economic and Monetary Union (EMU).

This paper examines the dynamics of EU reforms in these policy areas by focusing on the preferences and influence of the United Kingdom (UK). The UK has often been considered as an ‘awkward partner’ in the EU. Stephen George’s classic book, An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community (1990), points out the troubled relationship of the UK with the process of European integration since its inception. This paper argues that this view is somewhat unwarranted, especially in the case of financial policies. In these policies the UK has been a foot-dragger, a fence-sitter and a pace-setter, depending on the circumstances. The paper does not discuss in-depth the (often complex) intra-EU negotiations in these policy areas. At the same time, the domestic politics and political economy of these issues in the UK are not investigated in details. The aim of the paper is to explore how the EU policy-process and the domestic arena in the UK interacted and with what outcome. The material is organised as follows. Section 2 discusses some concepts that can be useful in order to examine the preferences and the influence of the member states in the EU policy-process. The empirical sections follow by and large a chronological order, discussing EU financial regulation first (Section 3), then BU (Section 4) and finally CMU (Section 5).

Read the study

Network
SPERI
Find all related publications
Publications
05/05/2025

Shaping a European budget fit for climate action and a just transition

The negotiations for the next EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) – the long-term budget at […]
22/04/2025

Trade, trust, and transition: Shaping the next transatlantic chapter

Essays series by FEPS and Center for American Progress (CAP)
08/04/2025

The profit-price spiral in food and energy

Analysis and toolbox to fight inflation
17/02/2025

Expected labour market effects of the Green Deal Industrial Plan (2)

A regional labour policy approach
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
11/04/2025

Trump’s tariff boomerang

Most trade pundits (and a few others) were shocked by the magnitude of Trump’s tariff […]
11/04/2025

Trade as a force for good jobs

Tariffs and trade wars are never good for workers who inevitably end up paying the […]
Find all related events
Events
Upcoming
12/06/2025
Brussels, Belgium

Inflation preparedness in the EU

Lessons learned and a new Inflation Governance Framework
Past
14/05/2025
Expert meeting

Inflation fuelled by energy and food prices

Expert roundtable on rising prices in Slovakia and the EU
20/05/2025
FEPS HQ (Expert Meeting)

Lessons learned from the RRF for a future European fiscal capacity

EU Investment Capacity Group
Find all related news
News
26/02/2025

FEPS reaction to the European Commission’s Clean Industrial Deal

What Teresa Ribera presented today is an ambitious plan that makes the case for Europe […]
07/02/2025

FEPS President on the European car industry and the Competitive Compass on Euronews ‘Brussels, my love?’

FEPS President Maria João Rodrigues took part in the Euronews talk show ‘Brussels, my love?‘ […]
27/06/2024

Join Tax the EU Billionaires Day!

Do you know that the richest 1% in Europe owns half of European wealth? Join […]
18/01/2024

FEPS President at Euronews talk-show ‘Brussels, my love?’

Alongside German conservative MEP Lars Patrick Berg and Fabian Zuleeg, Chief economist and director of […]
Find all related in the media
In the media

Tévedés azt hinni, hogy Trump után visszatérhetünk a régi kerékvágásba

by telex 24/04/2025
“It’s a mistake to think we can go back to the old normal after Trump”. Interview with FEPS Secretary General László Andor in Telex (HU), where he discusses the global trade tensions triggered by Trump-era tariffs, the shifting US-China dynamic, and the need for the EU to develop a new strategic approach in a permanently changed world order.

Brussels, my love? Europe’s economy in a struggle for survival

by Euronews 21/10/2024
FEPS director of studies and policy David Rinaldi participated in this episode of Euronews’ show ‘Brussels my love’.

Megadóztatná a szupergazdagokat? Ha igen, most tehet valamit

by Zöld Hang 04/10/2024
'Would you tax the super-rich? If so, you can do something now' Interview to FEPS Secretary General, László Andor on the 'Tax the rich' EU initiative by the Hungarian newspaper Zöld Hang.

Orbánov boj z zunanjim sovražnikom ni bil kos inflaciji

by DELO 28/05/2024
In an article in Delo, László Andor criticises Viktor Orbán government's economic policies, such as not allowing Hungary to join the euro area, which he believes would have helped curb inflation. He also criticises the government for blaming external enemies such as the President of the European Commission, to cover up its own failures.