Policy Study

11/06/2024

Cross-country workers’ survey on consequences of algorithmic management

Computer in command: Consequences of algorithmic management for workers

76% of workers within sectors like warehousing and telemarketing experience one or more forms of Algorithmic Management (AM) in the workplace. They report having less autonomy in their jobs, a greater workload, feeling more stressed, and greater concern among employees about their job security. 

These are the findings from the survey “Computer in command: Consequences of algorithmic management for workers” conducted by the Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) and Nordic think tanks among over 6,000 union members in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland. This study is the first of its kind to systematically examine the consequences of AM.

“Computer in command: Consequences of algorithmic management for workers” uncovers the adverse consequences AM for workers and how companies can avoid these effects. It shows that this use of AM has several negative consequences for the employeesincluding lower levels of trust between employees and management, lower motivation and job satisfaction, and greater concern among employees about their job security.

“The role of the manager has transformed with AM,” says Magnus Thorn Jensen, senior analyst at the Danish think tank Cevea and the study’s lead author. “Managers have always had the ability to monitor and control their employees, but new technologies have significantly expanded these possibilities. Our study shows that this can be detrimental to employee well-being.”

The survey indicates that some negative consequences for employees can be avoided if companies ensure a high degree of employee influence and transparency in management decisions. Where employee influence and transparency in management decisions are high, AM can be used without compromising employee job satisfaction, sense of job autonomy, and trust between management and employees. 

Whilst this is necessary, it alone is insufficient to ensure employee wellbeing. “There are limits to how intensive the surveillance and control that employees can be subjected to without harming the work environment,” says Asbjørn Sonne Nørgaard, director at Cevea and co-author of the report. “Therefore, there is a need to look at regulating how new technology is used in the workplace – both in collective agreements, legislation, and within individual companies.”

Whilst AM originated in the platform sector, the phenomenon has now spread across traditional sectors of the European labour market. The Platform Work Directive has set a precedent for a potential new European legislation on AI at the workplace, says Gerard Rinse Oosterwijk, digital policy analyst at FEPS and co-author of the report. “This study underlines the need for social dialogue on introducing and applying algorithmic management systems to mitigate some of the adverse effects on trust, autonomy, and job motivation, but also makes a case for legal guardrails and a potential new European directive to prevent adverse occupational health and safety risks of AM.”

Case studies for each country analysed in “Computer in command” are available below. Each study is focuses on a country based on quantitative surveys and focus groups provided in the language of the respective country.

Country case study – Survey: Denmark 🇩🇰

Computerchefer: Algoritmeledelse har store konsekvenser for medarbejderne

This publication focuses on the results of the survey among trade union members in Denmark. The study shows that Algorithmic Management (AM) is already quite widespread within warehouse work, customer service, telemarketing, and citizen services. A significant proportion of survey participants indicate that computer systems are used to assign shifts and tasks, monitor their activities, and evaluate their performance at work. This use of AM has a myriad of negative consequences for employees. They experience less autonomy in the performance of their daily tasks with an increased workload and stress level. Furthermore, this study shows that AM is associated with a diminished level of trust between employers and employees, a lower level of motivation and satisfaction in the job, as well as an increased fear of being fired for not reaching the expectations measured by the algorithm. Fortunately, these negative consequences are not entirely inevitable. The negative effects of AM are considerably less wherever there is a higher degree of employee influence in the decision-making and greater transparency in the management’s decisions. This study demonstrates that it is crucial for policy-makers, trade unions, and everyone in society to ensure that the use of new technologies in the labour market does not undermine employees’ well-being.

Country case study – Survey: Sweden 🇸🇪

Algoritmen som chef konsekvenser av algoritmiskt styrt arbete

This publication analyses the consequences of algorithmic management among Swedish warehouse workers. As the first large-scale quantitative analysis of its kind, the results of this study indicate that, on average, the use of AM has negative consequences for employees. The more workers are exposed to algorithmic control, the less autonomy they feel they have in their work, the less trust they feel from and towards their employer, and the greater workload they experience. Its use also affects employees’ well-being at work: When algorithmic control tools are widely used, employees are less satisfied with their jobs and less motivated, and they feel significantly more stressed and more uncertain about whether they will be able to keep their jobs.

But this study also shows that some of these consequences can be prevented through worker influence and transparency in the company’s decision-making processes. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to ensure that the trade unions have sufficient tools to defend their members’ interests when it comes to the implementation of new digital systems in the workplace, both to protect the employees against a dystopian work environment where every aspect of the work can be monitored and controlled and to ensure that the Swedish model, with its large degree of trust between the parties in the labour market, stands strong in tomorrow’s digital reality.

Country case study – Survey: Finland 🇫🇮

Johtajana Tietokone: Algoritmisen johtamisen vaikutuksia työntekijöihin

In the report, we design a new algorithm management index based on survey data, which shows that algorithmic systems have a more widespread use for management in Finland than in other Nordic countries. On the other hand, according to the research, the negative effects of algorithmic management can also be prevented. Algorithmic management does not necessarily have to weaken the position or well-being of employees, but it requires that they are made aware of how it is used. Unfortunately, so far, that condition has not materialised well enough in the Finnish case, as less than half of respondents were satisfied with their employer’s communication or felt they could influence decisions about the use of algorithms.

Country case study – Survey: Norway 🇳🇴

Når sjefen bruker kunstig intelligens: Hvilke konsekvenser algoritmestyrt ledelse har for ansatte
By Hilde Nagell

This report, resulting from a survey of workers from the Norwegian context, shows that the use of algorithmic management can be associated to a number of negative consequences such as reduced job autonomy, increased workload, reduced job security, lower trust, reduced job satisfaction and motivation, and higher stress levels. Fortunately, such consequences are not inevitable; Workplace conditions appear to be particularly important in determining whether employees experience negative consequences.

In organizations where employees are involved and have influence in decision-making on the work floor, negative consequences are reported to a lesser extent. On the other hand, employees who report having significant influence on important decisions experience negative consequences from algorithmic management to a much lesser extent.

Secondly, the relationship between employees and managers appears to matter. Where there is a high level of transparency in management decisions, the negative consequences are also far less prominent, and in some cases completely absent.

Online appendix

Below are the research data and questionnaires employed in each targeted country.

This policy study series is part of the Digital Research Programme

FEPS, Tankesmedjan Tiden, Kalevi Sorsa Saatio, Tankesmien Agenda, CEVEA, Arbejderbevægelsens Erhvervsråd (ECLM), Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Nordics and Cooperation Committee of the Nordic Labour Movement (SAMAK), with the support of Nordic trade Unions, came together for a Digital Research Programme to discuss the research questions, methods and approaches of the different research strands:

  1. Algorithmic management and governance (prevalence & consequences)
  2. Workers’ experience at the workplace – surveys and focus groups
  3. Online platforms and employment terms
Network
Cevea
Economic Council of the Labour Movement (ECLM)
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
Kalevi Sorsa Foundation
Samak
Tankesmedja Tiden
Tankesmien Agenda
Related publications
23/01/2024

Algorithms by and for the workers

Digital Programme: Algorithms at the workplace
18/01/2024

Employment terms of platform workers

Digital Programme: Algorithms at the workplace
Related events
16/10/2024
Brussels, Belgium (Hybrid)

Computer in command

Do the consequences of Algorithmic Management for workers require EU policy action?
Find all related publications
Publications
11/10/2024

Algorithmic management in traditional workplaces

Case studies on the impact of algorithmic technologies in seven sectors in the Nordics
12/06/2024

A Digital Union based on European values

FEPS Primer series - Ivana Bartoletti
23/01/2024

Algorithms by and for the workers

Digital Programme: Algorithms at the workplace
18/01/2024

Employment terms of platform workers

Digital Programme: Algorithms at the workplace
Find all related Progressive Post
Progressive Post
30/11/2023

Towards Sovereign AI: Europe´s greatest challenge?

15/06/2023

Future-proofing AI: regulation for innovation, human rights and societal progress

15/06/2023

Regulating AI: workers’ intellect versus Big Tech oligarchs

Find all related events
Events
Upcoming
11/12/2024
Stockholm, Sweden

Algorithmic governance and the Swedish model

Impact of algorithmic management on workers and co-determination opportunities
Past
13/11/2024
Oslo, Norway

Algorithmic governance and the Norwegian model

Exploring the challenges and possibilities of workers’ organising vis-à-vis the digital
15/10/2024
Brussels, Belgium

A Digital Union based on European values

Launch of the FEPS Primer book on digital by Ivana Bartoletti
Find all related news
News
13/03/2023

Digital programme: Algorithms at the workplace

FEPS, together with Nordic partners, launched a Digital Programme on algorithmic management and workers' rights
Find all related in the media
In the media

Regolamentare l’Intelligenza artificiale è la prossima frontiera progressista

by Gil Stati Generali 17/11/2024
The study "Algorithmic Management in the workplace| is discussed in this article on the implications of algorithmic managemnet on workers

Näitä työtehtäviä yritykset korvaisivat tekoälyllä

by MTV Uutiset 09/10/2024
Finnish Television interviews OP Yrityspanki CEO Katja Keitaanniemi and Demos Helsinki's senior expert Johannes Anttila about FEPS Policy Study 'Algorithmic management and workplace digitalisation in Finland'

Tekoäly tuli työpaikalle: Tuloksena kaaosta ja ärtyneitä asiakkaita

by Talouselämä 16/09/2024
'Artificial intelligence entered the workplace: The result is chaos and irritated customers' Finish article about FEPS Policy Study 'Algorithmic management and workplace digitalisation in Finland'

Työntekijöitä valvotaan algoritmeilla ja tekoälyllä

by Ylen Aamu 27/08/2024
"Employees are monitored with algorithms and artificial intelligence" Watch Jere Immonen's appearance on the Finnish TV morning news show Ylen Aamu, where he discusses his work on the country's case study for FEPS Digital Programme, focusing on the implementation of algorithmic systems in management across Finland